Posted on 05/21/2007 7:01:57 AM PDT by Mike Bates
CNN's Lou Dobbs asked me, during a discussion of the North American Union, why our media show no interest in the issue of sovereignty. I said it wasn't considered sexy enough. Perhaps if "sovereignty" had big breasts and shapely legs, like Anna Nicole Smith, we might stand a chance of getting some more coverage. Tragically, American sovereignty seems to be meeting the same fate as Miss Smith.
The U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), now being pushed by the Bush Administration for a quick vote, is already starting to get rave reviews from the press, with the Sacramento Bee saying that protecting the oceans of the world could be Bush's "legacy." The message to Bush is that he should go out as a liberal and he may salvage some of his reputation. But he will lose what is left of his conservative base.
As President Reagan understood, UNCLOS creates another dangerous U.N. bureaucracy, with a seabed "authority" to run ocean affairs, as well as a court system and a global tax. It is a mechanism created by the World Federalists as a major stepping stone on the road to world government. It is also designed to make it easier for the "international community" to thwart the exercise of U.S. military power in foreign affairs. One of the main authors, Elizabeth Mann Borgese, was a socialist who admired Karl Marx. But don't expect our media to report these facts to the American people.
U.S. Navy officials, acting clueless and completely in the dark about the nature of U.N. bureaucracies, are actually lobbying on Capitol Hill for Senate ratification of the pact.
(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...
Maybe they will stop Cuba and China from drilling off the coast of Florida.
The AIM Report left out one of the major aspects of the revision request.
>>>limit and regulate shipwreck salvage in international waters.<<<<
This is significant because the Nazi generals stole the holecaust victims gold at the end of WWII, and then fled. A boat carrying it was sunk off the coast of Venezuela.
http://dvd.ciao.co.uk/The_Search_For_Nazi_Gold_DVD__6224144
The Search For Nazi Gold
Also:
http://www.rense.com/general3/divers.htm
Divers In Greece Search For WWII Nazi Gold & Jewels
This goes hand in hand with the records being opened up:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1833916/posts
11-nation commission agrees to start transferring Nazi archive to Holocaust researchers
What the hell is wrong with the dumb asses at the U.S. Navy?
Why are they supporting this turkey known as LOST?
No.
It is because the scumbags in the media do not love America. Not one bit.
That big breasts and shapely legs might work. The colonists routinely depicted America as a bare-breasted maiden distressed by England. Just a thought. Get back to work everyone...
This combined with the amnisty bill and surrender in Iraq will just about do the US in.
America does have...large...tracts of land.
I’m actually mad that the media doesn’t cover more about the human trafficking. IMO, the amnesty is needed for the victims and the border crossers are used as a red herring.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1472612/posts?page=29#29
BUSH ADMINISTRATION HOSTS FIRST NATIONAL TRAINING CONFERENCE TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING
http://www.lifetimetv.com/movies/originals/humantrafficking.html
Why amnesty is even on the table and none of the media mentions it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1597900/posts
Another reason why amnesty is on the table and none of the media mentions it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1472612/posts?page=49#49
Amnesty is to protect the victims.
Even IF this bill passes, there will still be human smuggling simply because there will be a price to get here the poor cannot pay.
There will always be human excrement who take advantage of other people's greed.
Give me a break.
Are you saying the victims of human trafficking shouldn’t be given amnesty?
Actually, "she's got...huge...tracts of land.
The Spanish Inquisition will be at your door momentarily... they're bringing the comfy chair.... /grin
I'm saying that they are only "victims" of their own greed.
Call Your Senators Today!
Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121
Toll free: 1-888-534-6226
Border crossers are not the same as people that have been trafficked. This is why I’m angry with the media for not explaining this.
The Human Trafficking circuit kidnaps people, brings them here, and hold them in bond labor or servitude.
They didn’t come of their own free will for greed.
The Bush Administration has said from day one, he would bring an end to human trafficking. All his committees and speeches he has made on this consistantly stated, these would be the people given amnesty. Some need their families brought over to protect them. Read the links I’ve provided, it is all there. I have tons more if you need them.
One way ticket home. “Victims” my left nut...
You didn’t read my links either. People that are trafficked for slave labor are not border crossers. The two are being muddled by the media.
If you aren’t going to read the links, then don’t respond.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.