Where did they find them all? Did they expel their groomers, too?
Posted on 05/21/2007 5:02:31 PM PDT by Nachum
Kabul - More than 70 000 Afghans who were in Iran illegally have been returned in the past month, the United Nations said on Monday, as talks were under way between the neighbours over the controversial deportations.
The number of unregistered Afghans being expelled had eased off over the past week, the UN said.
The talks in Iran were to focus on how the deportations were carried out and also the treatment of deportees, it said.
There have been reports of returnees being separated from their families in the drive to get them out.
Tehran has said it wanted one million Afghans repatriated by next March. The 70 000 who have been sent back started returning from April 21.
Afghanistan has asked its neighbour to halt the returns, saying it does not have the capacity to accommodate a large number of people at once.
"We are concerned about the way the deportations are taking place," said Nader Farhad, a UN refugee agency information officer in Kabul.
Returning families
"It is important with such a large number of people, it should take place in a gradual and orderly manner."
Anger in Afghanistan about the returns has already cost the refugees minister his job. Parliament also wants Foreign Minister Rangeen Dadfar Spanta sacked.
The World Food Programme had provided a month's worth of food to more than 250 returning families in Farah province, one of the main collecting points for the returnees, the UN said.
There are about 920 000 registered Afghan refugees in Iran, which took in hundreds of thousands of Afghans during the country's years of war.
Where did they find them all? Did they expel their groomers, too?
They were expelled alright,from Afghanistan,Run Away,that taliban spring offensive ain't going so well;)
Perhaps we can learn some lessons on how to ship illegals back to their home countries, you think?
BTTT
Or if they've got some people they want to get across the border unnoticed, and are using a flood of refugees as cover.
Refugees or REINFORCEMENTS???
Agreed, except that I'd replace "some people" with "a large number of anti-Coalition forces and agents".
Broken clock is right twice a day.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.