Replies

I was primarily pissed at the clown for his misuse of the military, misuse of his interns and general misuse of the country (FBI files, dealings with arafat and Israel and on and on, ad nauseum). The borders were not such a big deal then, because we were not in a war wherein enemy combatants were slipping across our unguarded southern border. NOW WE ARE AND THEY ARE AND NOW WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO SPECIFICALLY REFUSES TO CLOSE THAT BORDER. There IS, in fact, a difference. And it’s pretty major. So there is no hypocrisy, not enough to matter, anyway. But, to ease your mind, I would also be more than willing to see ANYONE ELSE who has not consistently voted or worked to secure our borders properly be removed from political or any other governmental office and, ten minutes after a fair trial and conviction, have a nice long and drawn out bath in a vat of boiling oil. Then his or her rotten carcass could be used as fill for the border fence project. Fair enough?

Fair response. I beg the differ though, we have been at war since 1993 with Al Qaeda when they bombed one of the twin towers. Osama Bin Laden declared open war against the US in 1996 and middle eastern men are believed to have been involved with Tim McVeigh in the OKC bombing. The borders should have been secured after the 1993 bombing but they were not. The same people calling for GW’s impeachment, which I will stand with him any day, should have been screaming for the borders to be closed then. They were not, and they were not calling for Clinton’s impeachment for failing to do so. That is hypocritical and I will continue to point it out.