Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WayneM

Which way are we supposed to freep? His stance on the border is very near treason.


2 posted on 05/21/2007 7:46:54 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SmoothTalker

Yes , but thats only between us. In enemy territory we stand together. Check # 3.


4 posted on 05/21/2007 7:48:10 PM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker

You are reading my mind!


5 posted on 05/21/2007 7:48:54 PM PDT by ears_to_hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker
Which way are we supposed to freep? His stance on the border is very near treason.

Minor correction. His stance on the border is several thousand miles over the line into BLATANT, OVERT, CAPITAL TREASON.

8 posted on 05/21/2007 7:49:20 PM PDT by Rytwyng (Mr. Bushbachov, close down this border!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker

I agree, and the border is a security issue. I’ll stand for somebody I think is right, not just because he’s got an “R” next to his name.


10 posted on 05/21/2007 7:49:56 PM PDT by digitalbrownshirt (http://digitalbrownshirt.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker
His stance on the border is very near treason.

When it comes to an MSNBC poll, I'll continue to support the President. Kind of a "the enemies of my enemies are my friends" sort of thing.

15 posted on 05/21/2007 7:51:41 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker
His stance on the border is very near treason.

Not unless you also impeach every member of Congress whose votes caused the legislation to pass. The President hasn't signed an executive order changing anything to do with border control, so it's not solely his decision.

24 posted on 05/21/2007 7:53:30 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker
Which way are we supposed to freep? His stance on the border is very near treason.

You said it.

43 posted on 05/21/2007 7:58:50 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker

I wouldn’t frrep that pole.

Bush took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, and, by extension, its laws, including its border laws. Bush is NOT guilty of neglecting our border. On the contrary, he has actively collaborated with the Mexican government to violate those laws, persecuted American government employees attempting to enforce those laws, worked with American corporate interests to subvert those laws, all acts which border on treason. At the very least, they fit the description of high crimes and misdemeanors. Bush SHOULD have been impeached - by his own party once he took this course. Had they done so, we would still have controll of COngress.

At the very moment when we needed a strong leader to wage a war against international Islam which is out to detroy us and everything the west has struggled for, for the past several millenia, at the same time when we needed strong leadership to confron traitors like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and their cohorts of demons who are more than willing to sacrifice American interests for bsae political ends, we get this - another George Bush who runs for office as conservative Republican, then turns into a liberal marshmallow who collaborates with Mexico and Ted Kennedy.

If he were impeached, we’d get Cheney who would make a far better president than Bush, but then the Dems would probably impeach HIM and the Face-Lift Queen would be sitting in the White House.

Great Country WASN’T it?


52 posted on 05/21/2007 8:02:27 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker

I don’t get it. Didn’t everybody know GWB’s position even before the 2004 Election? And now many Freepers even considerers to impeach him?


69 posted on 05/21/2007 8:21:26 PM PDT by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker

Agreed!!!!!!


80 posted on 05/21/2007 8:34:09 PM PDT by Plains Drifter (I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker
Which way are we supposed to freep? His stance on the border is very near treason.

If A = B, and B = C, then A = C.

W swore and oath to the American people to uphold the Consitution and America's laws.

By not enforcing our laws, he is breaking his promise to the American people and his oath to the office of the President.

Therefore...

140 posted on 05/21/2007 9:31:14 PM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson