Well had there been no Bible there would be no United States and thus no ISU nor "Professor" Avalos.
But this only strengthens Gonzales' case should he file suit for discrimination.
Well had there been no Bible there would be no United States and thus no ISU nor "Professor Avalos".
You could just as easily say 'had there been no slavery there would be no United States and thus no ISU nor Professor Avalos'. What does that prove? Nothing really. Its the butterfly affect and says nothing about the merits of either the Bible or slavery.