Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

Government should not be in the business of regulating adult sexual relationships, homo, hetero or otherwise. It doesn’t bother me if some Hellbound fags want to shack up under whatever sort of contract they desire. But there should be no government endorsement of such a relationship, nor should there be a legal re-defining of the word “marriage” to encompass such a thing.


10 posted on 05/22/2007 7:51:50 AM PDT by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Sloth
Government should not be in the business of regulating adult sexual relationships

I think when there is a compelling societal interest, they should. A society that abandons the traditional one man, one woman for life marriage idea finds itself slowing rotting away from the insides. We can look at the U.S. and see it for ourselves.

115 posted on 05/24/2007 10:39:53 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Sloth

Not the Baptists. In the SBC goes that way, churches will withdraw. If the local church goes that way, members will start a new church.

Baptists won’t have the problems that the Episcopalians do, each church owns its own property and is totally independent of the others and of the convention.


118 posted on 05/24/2007 11:36:01 AM PDT by chesley (Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson