Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bd476
Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., defended Kyl, one of the chief architects of the immigration reform package, as a conservative Republican.

“This is a conservative bill. What people haven’t appreciated fully yet — and I think they will when they step back and actually see the language — is that Kyl won some big concessions on this for some areas of real concern,” Flake told the Tribune.

This country is doomed.

3 posted on 05/22/2007 7:07:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Any politician who supports amnesty is deader politically than Teddy Kennedy's liver...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance; bd476
“This is a conservative bill. What people haven’t appreciated fully yet — and I think they will when they step back and actually see the language — is that Kyl won some big concessions on this for some areas of real concern,” Flake told the Tribune.

Really? I doubt that a truly conservative bill would include language like the following:

ALIENS ASSOCIATED WITH CRIMINAL GANGS - Unless the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General waives the application of this subparagraph, any alien who a consular officer, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security knows or has reason to believe has participated in a criminal gang (as defined in section 101(a)(52)), knowing or having reason to know that such participation promoted, furthered, aided, or supported the illegal activity of the criminal gang, is inadmissible.

ALIENS ASSOCIATED WITH CRIMINAL GANGS- Any alien, in or admitted to the United States, who at any time has participated in a criminal gang (as defined in section 101(a)(52)), knowing or having reason to know that such participation will promote, further, aid, or support the illegal activity of the criminal gang is deportable. The Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General may in his discretion waive this subparagraph.

There are 63 other instances of the occurrences of the word "waive" in the copy of the bill I took these from.

A law can require 15 years of very rigorous hoop-jumping but how many will actually jump through those hoops if Congress gives the Secretary of the agency that administers the law the ability to exempt people from having to jump through one or more of them. Or to declare people who are, by definition, ineligible to be eligible.

17 posted on 05/22/2007 7:35:20 PM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson