Replies

When the ruling occurred, I posted that it would not save any children, but that the mere fact a subpreme court ruling had finally upheld the legislature’s right to ban some killing methodology had to be a positive. Those attacking Dr. Dobson are exhibiting their zeal, and perhaps they want a complete ban on abortion ... but a complete ban is not possible so long as there are not ways to save the alive unborn in a pregnancy termination because a pregnant female American must have the right of self-defense, to end a pregnancy which endangers her life. Of course, to see the zealot’s side, how can the subpreme court give the right to kill another alive human being to a pregnant American? It is insane! On the other hand, if the entire set of issues were taken from the perspective of self-defense —for the pregnant American and the alive unborn-- then some sense might be possible in this horrid trend where a pregnant female is granted by fiat from nine black robed demigods a right to hire a serial killer to off an alive unborn child!