Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC News accused of treasonous report
worldnetdaily ^ | May 23, 2007 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 05/23/2007 7:32:53 PM PDT by ovrtaxt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: philman_36

They probably heard it from Judith Miller LOL


61 posted on 05/24/2007 4:05:00 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (I would rather vote for Lindsay Lohan than Lindsey Graham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

It seems Treason is the in word this year.


62 posted on 05/24/2007 4:06:19 AM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

And prosecution for treason apparently isn’t.


63 posted on 05/24/2007 4:07:32 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (I would rather vote for Lindsay Lohan than Lindsey Graham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Boy is that ever the truest statement made on FR!!!


64 posted on 05/24/2007 4:08:38 AM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Um... their “madness” is spreading.


65 posted on 05/24/2007 4:09:36 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

They’ll soon be planting nukes in American cities, yet the Bush Administration (says ABC) has no objection to ABC reporting on efforts to overthrow their govt.
Does that make sense?


66 posted on 05/24/2007 4:17:44 AM PDT by Graymatter (FREDeralist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

I’ve given up on making sense of this administration.


67 posted on 05/24/2007 4:21:05 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (I would rather vote for Lindsay Lohan than Lindsey Graham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

I would bet the response by the White House was something akin to “we can neither confirm nor deny” the story....for ABC that was approval to report. ABC should have known better and probably did, but for them....more troop deaths is more ratings, and that is all they want. They could care less about our forces, our country, or our way of life. ABC, CBS, NBC and all the others are rightly called the “enemedia” (a term I think originated at Lucianne.com).


68 posted on 05/24/2007 4:27:38 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
The ABC report is disinformation, psych warfare a diversionary tactic.

The real show is at the WH with constant denials of any intent to bomb Iran. Meanwhile two carrier battle groups are conducing war exercises within the Persian Gulf.


BUMP

69 posted on 05/24/2007 4:28:36 AM PDT by capitalist229 (Get Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Maybe we wanted this story out...

That's my thinking as well. This story coupled with the fleet to Iran's doorstep sends a message.

70 posted on 05/24/2007 4:54:15 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
What's everyone getting so excited about ?? This certainly doesn't have the serious security risks that the outing of Valerie Plame had....

/sarc

71 posted on 05/24/2007 4:57:54 AM PDT by Mopp4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

I think you have me confused with some one else. I was talking about the media sitting in their charis and pumping their fists in the air and cheering when American troops get killed.

Don’t read anything else into my statement. I said nothing about the security, American people, etc...


72 posted on 05/24/2007 6:20:37 AM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: silentknight

> According to ABC they asked the Government to give permission before this was all aired. Apparently the U.S. Government made no objection to the report. Go figure.

Please note ABC’s Clintonesque parsing of words. “The goverment made no objection” - well the standard answer to this type of inquiry - “We do not comment on intelligence matters” - is not an objection. See how ABC has twisted this to make it seem the government gave the OK.


73 posted on 05/24/2007 6:29:35 AM PDT by NoBullZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Two points:

The “source” of this might well have been approved by the WH to leak this for whatever reason. Note they didn’t even object to the report. Ever hear of disinformation?

Even if this truly was an unauthorized leak, how many folks here REALLY believe Iran doesn’t think this stuff is already going on? Do you actually think they’re shocked or surprised? I’m certainly not.


74 posted on 05/24/2007 6:39:14 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

If anyone took me as serious, they don’t belong on FreeRepublic! ;^)


75 posted on 05/24/2007 6:51:09 AM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
The big question is, which Clinton hold-over leaked the story?

The next question is, why won't the DOJ prosecute either the leaker or ABC?

76 posted on 05/24/2007 6:58:30 AM PDT by Gritty (The MSM are active accessories to war waged against the free world–an enemy within-Melanie Phillips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

I am sure they will get on it as soon as they finish proving that Karl Rove leaked Valarie Plame’s secret name to the press.


77 posted on 05/24/2007 7:52:26 AM PDT by Holicheese (I love shrimp and grits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SengirV
Ah, now I get you. I took your "that's what they are doing" - which, notice, was a specifics-free pack of pronouns (lol) as refering to my conclusion rather than that one image.
78 posted on 05/24/2007 10:50:09 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

I debated quoting the specific part I was commenting on, but was too lazy. Next time I will ;)


79 posted on 05/24/2007 11:27:49 AM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: airborne
"If anyone took me as serious, they don’t belong on FreeRepublic! ;^)"

Ditto {8^)

80 posted on 05/24/2007 11:40:02 AM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson