Posted on 05/23/2007 9:24:21 PM PDT by Politicalmom
For a time, Georgia was poised to become the latest state to require preteen girls to be vaccinated against a virus that causes cervical cancer.
A powerful state Republican lawmaker proposed making the vaccine mandatory for girls entering sixth grade, and the governor included $4.3 million in his budget to make it available to some 13,000 girls whose family's insurance policies wouldn't cover it.
But state lawmakers nixed the plans after aggressive lobbying by religious conservatives, who argued that vaccinating young girls could promote promiscuity. The human papillomavirus that causes cervical cancer is transmitted through sexual contact.
Similar proposals were introduced in 23 other states and the District of Columbia, but only Virginia has signed such a mandate into law.
Proposals in many states died or were watered down to only provide parents with educational materials instead of requiring the vaccine. In Texas, Gov. Rick Perry signed an executive order requiring vaccinations for sixth-grade girls, but the Legislature then passed a bill blocking the order.
Over the past several months, a vaccine that once was hailed as a breakthrough to prevent cancer deaths has become embroiled in some of the nation's most politically charged issues: teen sex, parental control, state mandates, a backlash against vaccines and a suspicion of drug companies.
"It encapsulates so many issues that are at the core of politics and health policy right now," said Alina Salganicoff, director of women's health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation.
The vaccine Gardasil was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in June 2006. The federal Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices followed with a recommendation that all girls be vaccinated at age 11 or 12. The three-dose treatment costs $360.
Cervical cancer kills 10 women a day in the U.S. and one in four U.S. women ages 14 to 59 is infected with HPV, according to a recent report from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. While Gardasil is not a magic bullet, it protects against the strains of HPV that cause 70 percent of cervical cancers cases.
With the vaccine potentially saving many lives, cervical cancer survivor Lori Grice said, she was "completely dumbfounded" that it had become fodder for the culture wars.
"If this were a vaccine for prostate cancer they would have to call in the National Guard to keep the men from storming the place," said Grice, of Statesboro, Ga.
Grice said she plans to have her 6-year-old daughter vaccinated when she's old enough. She said her daughter can "make every right choice," avoiding IV drug use and premarital sex, "but she can marry someone who's a carrier of HPV, develop cervical cancer and die."
The sponsor of the Georgia bill, state Sen. Don Balfour, has said it is a great thing for the health of women in the state.
"It's good for your daughters," he said in a February hearing.
Others saw the vaccine mandate proposals differently.
The religious conservatives did not want the government to mandate a vaccine for "something that is only contracted through sexual activity," said Sadie Fields, executive director of the Georgia Christian Alliance.
Some parents insist that they should decide when their preteen daughter should be offered a vaccine that involved a discussion about sex.
Moira Gaul, director of women's and reproductive health at the conservative Family Research Council, said her group doesn't oppose the vaccine, but doesn't want it required.
"We think parents ought to be given a choice about what is best for their children," she said.
Others were turned off by what they saw as heavy-handed lobbying by the drug's maker, Merck and Co. Critics saw a drug company trying to get rich.
And there were worries that not enough was known about the drug's long-term health effects. As ammunition, critics pointed to Merck's recall of it's popular arthritis drug Vioxx because of increased heart risks. Merck has since said it will not lobby states for mandate bills.
Others argue politics is winning out over public health.
"It's really a shame that politics and ideology are getting in the way of saving lives," said Cantu Hinojosa, assistant director of government relations for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Hinojosa noted that the mandate bills — including the new law in Virginia — have opt-out provisions for parents who don't want their daughters vaccinated.
Still, Hinojosa said five states — Indiana, New York, North Dakota, Utah and Washington — have agreed to fund public education campaigns, which she said is a positive first step.
It's true madness when a kid may have to be taken to another state to get a vaccine against CANCER because some idiots are afraid of it.
A drug company paid off politicians to push these laws all over the country. Our idiot Gov. Rick Perry signed up to “help” snd got slapped down.
Does the vaccine work, or is it ineffective?
Then, there’s this news about the cancer vaccine and deaths.....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1838854/posts
The vaccine works against 4 of 38+ strains of HPV that can cause cervical cancer. These 4 are said to be the most common. However, not every woman with those strains gets cervical cancer, and not every cervical cancer victim has one of those four strains.
In addition, as reported on another thread, there were over 1700 adverse reactions to the vaccine, including three deaths in young girls/women, and over 400 SERIOUS reactions to the vaccine.
To REQUIRE millions of innocent 11 yos to take this vaccine is to agree to murder a few. That’s okay with you?
Availability isn’t the issue. It should be a decision between parents and physicans though.
As someone who is both religious and conservative, religious conservatives are more and more ticking me off. The argument that a vaccine would promote promiscuity boggles the mind for so many reasons, not the least of which is that it assumes teenagers are doing a precise risk/reward analysis when they decide to have sex.
And what do these arbiters of all that is good and holy have to say about the circumstances where the woman does not have sex until she is married, but her husband has, and is a carrier of HPV. Should she be put at risk for cervical cancer to satisfy some kind of agenda? Or should we stick our heads in the sand and pretend that all religious people refrain from sexual activity until they are married? GAH! It's madness.
1700 adverse reactions out of how many vaccinations? Plus, as you say, only 400 of them were serious. 400 serious reactions out of how many vaccinations? Unfortunately, nearly all vaccines carry with them some risk and some people do die from vaccines. I had a severe reaction to the flu/pneumonia vaccine several years ago. Should it be yanked off the market because I was exquisitely sensitive to it?
I do agree that the determination of whether to get this particular vaccination should be left to the parents and physician because the consequences of non-vaccination are limited to the girl who has been denied the vaccine. For vaccines which carry some kind of public health threat (i.e. MMR), people should be forced to get the vaccine. The public doesn't need to be exposed to rubella because someone felt the vaccine was unhealthy.
PARENTS make the decisions for their children.
The government has NO right to mandate a vaccine for something that cannot be transmitted by sitting adjacent to someone in a classroom.
Your utter lack of concern for children who are brain damaged and killed by vaccines is noted.
Your utter lack of understaning that every vaccine and every medicine on the market, from penicillin on down, carries risk is also noted.
I wasn't aware of that. In that case, hell no! I'll humbly take my lumps and flames on this one for not being better informed.
Those adverse reactions occurred during the final research stage. I don’t know why the FDA approved the thing, it’s dangerous. And with that many adverse reactions, mandating it is criminal, in my opinion.
We’re ALL going to die....sometime.....did you read the thread about diet and it’s connection to helping in lung disease?.....I’ll bet there’s a connection in cervical cancer too.....JMHO.
The medical industrial complex wants you to believe they can save you from every little thing in life that might make you die.....don’t buy it.
As someone mentioned, with all vaccines there are risks. Is there a formula the FDA uses to determine a drug is to high a risk?
Probably the amount of campaign contributions vs reasonable saftey.
That's got my vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.