Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham
Maybe my grandmother had some ill will, but she was born only a decade after the War and the damage inflicted by Sherman was an everyday part of her life

You see many many precivil war homes up north but not too many in the south. The yankees burned most the beautiful old homes here. The ones that were spared were used as headquarters or housing for the yankees and they didn't care what happened to the women and children burned out or put out of there homes. I understand why your grandmother felt that way.

660 posted on 05/24/2007 9:49:06 PM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies ]


To: beckysueb

One house on the family property remained standing, a log home that was built in 1840 after Indian lands were opened by the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek. It still stands today, incorporated into a modern home by one of my cousins.

The log house was outside of town somewhat, but the nearby city was burned to the ground in a practice run by Sherman, in preparation for what he would do to Georgia. Famine and exposure were very real to the people who remained, and what had been a very prosperous region suffered for decades after. There was no Marshall Plan. Sherman’s intention was to cause as much suffering as he could, and starving civilians with no shelter meant nothing to him.

It has occurred to me that America’s subsequent kindness to conquered people had its roots in reaction to how the North treated the South. Southerners like Woodrow Wilson and George Marshall, Patton for that matter, didn’t intend to be part of repeating that sad chapter in American history.


676 posted on 05/24/2007 10:19:55 PM PDT by Pelham (theTerryAndersonShow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson