Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GWB in 2004: "In September 2003, he [Kerry] supported amnesty for illegal aliens".
2004 Third Bush-Kerry Debate ^ | October 13, 2004 | George W. Bush

Posted on 05/25/2007 11:56:49 PM PDT by Plutarch

SCHIEFFER: Let's go to a new question, Mr. President. 

I got more e-mail this week on this question than any other question. And it is about immigration. 

I'm told that at least 8,000 people cross our borders illegally every day. Some people believe this is a security issue, as you know. Some believe it's an economic issue. Some see it as a human-rights issue.

How do you see it? And what we need to do about it?

BUSH: I see it as a serious problem. I see it as a security issue, I see it as an economic issue, and I see it as a human-rights issue. 

We're increasing the border security of the United States. We've got 1,000 more Border Patrol agents on the southern border.

We're using new equipment. We're using unmanned vehicles to spot people coming across. 

And we'll continue to do so over the next four years. It's a subject I'm very familiar with. After all, I was a border governor for a while.

Many people are coming to this country for economic reasons. They're coming here to work. If you can make 50 cents in the heart of Mexico, for example, or make $5 here in America, $5.15, you're going to come here if you're worth your salt, if you want to put food on the table for your families. And that's what's happening.

And so in order to take pressure off the borders, in order to make the borders more secure, I believe there ought to be a temporary worker card that allows a willing worker and a willing employer to mate up, so long as there's not an American willing to do that job, to join up in order to be able to fulfill the employers' needs. 

That has the benefit of making sure our employers aren't breaking the law as they try to fill their workforce needs. It makes sure that the people coming across the border are humanely treated, that they're not kept in the shadows of our society, that they're able to go back and forth to see their families. See, the card, it'll have a period of time attached to it. 

It also means it takes pressure off the border. If somebody is coming here to work with a card, it means they're not going to have to sneak across the border. It means our border patrol will be more likely to be able to focus on doing their job. 

Now, it's very important for our citizens to also know that I don't believe we ought to have amnesty. I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. And we ought not to crowd these people ahead of them in line. 

BUSH: If they want to become a citizen, they can stand in line, too.

And here is where my opponent and I differ. In September 2003, he supported amnesty for illegal aliens.

SCHIEFFER: Time's up.

Senator?

KERRY: Let me just answer one part of the last question quickly, and then I'll come to immigration...

Now with respect to immigration reform, the president broke his promise on immigration reform. He said he would reform it. Four years later he is now promising another plan.

Here's what I'll do: Number one, the borders are more leaking today than they were before 9/11. The fact is, we haven't done what we need to do to toughen up our borders, and I will. 

Secondly, we need a guest-worker program, but if it's all we have, it's not going to solve the problem.

The second thing we need is to crack down on illegal hiring. It's against the law in the United States to hire people illegally, and we ought to be enforcing that law properly.

And thirdly, we need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows.

SCHIEFFER: Do you want to respond, Mr. President?

BUSH: Well, to say that the borders are not as protected as they were prior to September the 11th shows he doesn't know the borders. They're much better protected today than they were when I was the governor of Texas. 

We have much more manpower and much more equipment there. 

He just doesn't understand how the borders work, evidently, to say that. That is an outrageous claim.

And we'll continue to protect our borders. We're continuing to increase manpower and equipment.

SCHIEFFER: Senator?

KERRY: Four thousand people a day are coming across the border. 

The fact is that we now have people from the Middle East, allegedly, coming across the border.

And we're not doing what we ought to do in terms of the technology. We have iris-identification technology. We have thumbprint, fingerprint technology today. We can know who the people are, that they're really the people they say they are when the cross the border. 

We could speed it up. There are huge delays.

The fact is our borders are not as secure as they ought to be, and I'll make them secure.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bush; georgewbush; immigration; jorgeboosh
Back when President Bush was seeking our support for re-election, there was such a thing as Amnesty to him, which was Senator Kerry's "Earned Legalization". Senator Kerry denied that it was Amnesty. If the Senate Bill today was Kerry's program, who doubts that Bush would support it, sign it, and deny it was Amnesty?

I do not know what specifically President Bush was referring to that Kerry proposed in September 2003. This is what Kerry had to say in the Democrat Debate in October 2003:

_______________________________________________

Senator Kerry, would you support legalizing undocumented immigrants in this country?

JOHN KERRY: Absolutely. I supported--let me say I'm not afraid to say it, I supported and was prepared to vote for amnesty from 1986. And unfortunately, the events of 9/11 obviously changed the capacity to do that.

I believe we have to change it. It's a matter of human rights, a matter of civil rights, a matter of fairness to Americans. And it is essential to have immigration reform.

I want to say immediately that anyone who has been in this country for five or six years, who's paid their taxes, who has stayed out of trouble ought to be able to translate into an American citizen immediately, not waiting. In addition to that, we have about 37,000 people served in the armed forces of the United States who are legal residents. They should automatically become American citizens for having served their country in that way.

And thirdly, I believe we need to be sensible about the use of the matricula cards. We need to be able to negotiate with President Fox. We have to change the guest worker program.

We have to recognize that there are enormous challenges to fairness in this country. It still costs Latinos too much just to cash a check, to buy a home. There is rank discrimination and we need to apply the laws. And I am going to do that from everything including remittances so people aren't charged exorbitantly when they send money to their families abroad.

1 posted on 05/25/2007 11:56:51 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
George Bush has always been honest about amnesty. That's what he has wanted since he was Governor Of Texas.

Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

2 posted on 05/25/2007 11:59:06 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. And we ought not to crowd these people ahead of them in line.

Well, this Comprehensive Invasion Bill does reward illegal behavior.

3 posted on 05/26/2007 12:01:49 AM PDT by LFOD777 (In 2006, Washington spent $2.7 Trillion and ran a $248 billion budget deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LFOD777
Of course it does. That's why politicians' promises at election time tend to be tempered by the realities of power and "growing in office."

Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

4 posted on 05/26/2007 12:03:03 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
BUSH: I see it as a serious problem. I see it as a security issue, I see it as an economic issue, and I see it as a human-rights issue.

By "human rights issue" I'm guessing he doesn't mean the right of citizen humans to be free from invasion.

5 posted on 05/26/2007 12:05:08 AM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
BUSH: I see it as a serious problem. I see it as a security issue, I see it as an economic issue, and I see it as a human-rights issue.

By "human rights issue" I'm guessing he doesn't mean the right of citizen humans to be free from invasion.

6 posted on 05/26/2007 12:05:09 AM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

So Bush was against amnesty before he was for it? Obviously spending time with Kerry rubbed off on him.


7 posted on 05/26/2007 12:05:49 AM PDT by FremontLives (The eagle never lost so much time as when he submitted to learn from the crow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
George Bush has always been honest about amnesty. That's what he has wanted since he was Governor Of Texas.

That is true. But he was less than candid about planning to use the power of the presidency to thwart border control efforts. He never mentioned not enforcing laws he disagreed with.

Regards

8 posted on 05/26/2007 12:08:17 AM PDT by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
George Bush has always been honest about amnesty.

I don't think so, he's as duplicitous as any other career politician.

President Bush:

"Now, it's very important for our citizens to also know that I don't believe we ought to have amnesty. I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. And we ought not to crowd these people ahead of them in line."

9 posted on 05/26/2007 12:13:20 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
With the Z Visa though, break the law and get guaranteed lifetime admission to the United States. That's a better deal than admission to Disneyland!

Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

10 posted on 05/26/2007 12:16:24 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
With the Z Visa though, break the law and get guaranteed lifetime admission to the United States. That's a better deal than admission to Disneyland!

Maybe we should just expand the amnesty. Anyone who has committed any crime before January 1, will be forgiven if they pay $5K. Who knows, this might even balance the budget.

11 posted on 05/26/2007 12:25:03 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
George Bush has always been honest about amnesty.

Can you point out where exactly he is being honest in this important debate right before the closely contested 2004 election?

12 posted on 05/26/2007 12:25:33 AM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Bush is at least as honest about amnesty as he was about Iraq. Both will go down as two of the greatest disasters in our histor, caused by a “conservative” President who wasn’t conservative in the least.


13 posted on 05/26/2007 2:08:22 AM PDT by laconic (ence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Bush took an oath of office to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. That includes defending America, its laws and borders.

He has actively conspired with the Mexican government to violate those laws and is continuing to do so despite the direct expressed collective outrage of the majority of Americans.

Connect the dots.

14 posted on 05/26/2007 2:41:35 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: laconic
Bush is at least as honest about amnesty as he was about Iraq.

Bush Lied, America Died?

15 posted on 05/26/2007 7:43:17 AM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Good catch. GWB won by such a small margin each time, and the immigration issue was a big blip on the radar. It’s clear that he is turning his back on the base — he doesn’t need their support any more. But this action is damaging to the republican party and it’s hard to see why he’s going down this path.


16 posted on 05/26/2007 8:18:54 AM PDT by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

BUSH: Well, to say that the borders are not as protected as they were prior to September the 11th shows he doesn’t know the borders. They’re much better protected today than they were when I was the governor of Texas.


oh ok...nevermind..


17 posted on 05/26/2007 8:42:48 AM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

“But this action is damaging to the republican party and it’s hard to see why he’s going down this path.”

You’ve already stated the reason. He doesn’t need their support anymore. The future of the GOP - and apparently the country - are of no concern to him. He certainly doesn’t care what happens to us.


18 posted on 05/28/2007 10:46:27 AM PDT by FredHunter08 (Guiliani! Come and Take Them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson