Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
...the employer doesn't have to incur additional costs...
But the employer's lower costs is what is allowing him to pay the higher wage the illegal worker is "commanding", isn't it?
64 posted on 05/26/2007 6:40:15 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
That's exactly right -- and that's why I've said here that "legalizing" illegal aliens isn't going to change a damn thing . . . because there will still be a latent demand for unregulated labor in many industries.

It's worth noting that illegal immigration was never a "problem" in this country until we had a massive government in place that introduced major distortions in the marketplace for labor and other services.

You didn't hear so many complaints about illegal immigration back in the latter half of the 19th century (the term "illegal immigrant" may have even been completely meaningless back then) -- mainly because the immigrant from Europe who filed a homestead claim out on the Great Plains had no financial advantage over the American citizen who owned the farm across the road. They both worked from dawn to dusk, and neither of them had the ability to use the power of government to force the other to do anything. All transactions were voluntary, and the system worked very well from a purely economic standpoint.

71 posted on 05/26/2007 6:54:41 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson