"In summary, the carbon-14 method, when corrected for the effects of the flood, can give useful results, but needs to be applied carefully.
It does not give dates of millions of years and when corrected properly fits well with the biblical flood."
Of course it doesn't. AIG is VERY misleading (lying?)
In summary, the carbon-14 method, when corrected for the effects of the flood, can give useful results, but needs to be applied carefully. It does not give dates of millions of years and when corrected properly fits well with the biblical flood." Of course it doesn't. AIG is VERY misleading (lying?) Well, they weren't lying about those dinosaur bones, now where they?
The Radiocarbon method is only accurate up to 3,500 years.
After that, the dating is based on a evolutionary presupposition-which is wrong.
So the only one lying are the evolutionists who try to palm off what they are pushing as science.