To: fortheDeclaration
I gave you existent dinosaur bones, something you said couldn't exist. True. I was not aware of those. But the article does not support your idea that they are of the same age as humans (ca. 5000 years). And this article shows they are about 69.1 ± 0.3 million years old. It also shows that:
Microbeam PIXE has revealed that calcium and phosphorus are at reasonably expected concentrations in the analyzed dinosaur bone samples. However, significant amounts of iron, zinc, manganese, barium and strontium have been observed to be distributed throughout all dinosaur bone thin sections analyzed. Concentrations of many of these elements are at least an order of magnitude higher than those in modern reptilian and mammalian bones [emphasis added].
You still can't place humans and dinosaurs in the same time frame.
47 posted on
05/26/2007 12:12:43 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
gave you existent dinosaur bones, something you said couldn't exist. True. I was not aware of those. But the article does not support your idea that they are of the same age as humans (ca. 5000 years). And this article shows they are about 69.1 ± 0.3 million years old. It also shows that: Microbeam PIXE has revealed that calcium and phosphorus are at reasonably expected concentrations in the analyzed dinosaur bone samples. However, significant amounts of iron, zinc, manganese, barium and strontium have been observed to be distributed throughout all dinosaur bone thin sections analyzed. Concentrations of many of these elements are at least an order of magnitude higher than those in modern reptilian and mammalian bones [emphasis added]. You still can't place humans and dinosaurs in the same time frame.
Those dates are assumptions by the evolutionists, believing that is when dinosaurs existed.
However, the issue of diagenesis, or the chemical changes that occur to fossil bone after it is buried (dissolution, recrystallization, replacement of bone by other minerals) raises doubts as to the value of the isotopic signal to interpret the physiology of ancient animals and the environmental constraints they lived under. The inherent assumption of stable istope anaylsis of ancient bone is that apatitic fossils are isotopically unaltered. This notion has been challenged by several scientists whose conclusions undermine current interpretations of dinosaur physiology and paleoenvironmental reconstructions based on stable isotope analysis.
77 posted on
05/27/2007 7:17:53 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: Coyoteman
"You still can't place humans and dinosaurs in the same time frame...."
Honestly, I am a Christian....and I can't believe this conversation is taking place....
It is undeniable the the earth is more than 5000 years old....and it is clear humans did not coexist with the Dino's....
I believe the heavens and the earth were created by God...some call it it Intelligent Design....but please, we have to stop trying to fit a square peg into a round hole....when it doesn't fit....it just doesn't fit...
98 posted on
05/29/2007 5:47:18 AM PDT by
PigRigger
(Donate to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org - The Troops have our front covered, let's guard their backs!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson