[Man50D]

I don't think they are. The act is immoral, not simply the desire.

You are splitting hairs. Using the term "Homosexuality" implies more than the desire. It implies the act. It is not homosexuality unless it occurs. Your line of reasoning reminds me of Bill Clinton supporters who tried to dismiss his trysts with Moanica Lewinsky by telling people they should separate the man from his character. That is absolutely ludicrous. A person's character is the core of his or her being. They are inseparable.

[robertpaulsen]

"Using the term "Homosexuality" implies more than the desire. It implies the act."

I always thought homosexuality was same-sex attraction. That you can be a homosexual even if you've never acted on it.

Anyways, General Pace was condemning the homosexual act as immoral, not the person.