Skip to comments.
War Over War Vote Rages On
washingtonpost.com ^
| Saturday, May 26, 2007; Page A05
| -- Shailagh Murray
Posted on 05/26/2007 8:47:30 PM PDT by DBCJR
For Democratic Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama (Ill.), their votes against the war spending bill were far from the last word on the issue.
The crowd of Republican presidential candidates dined out all day on the Democratic front-runners' "no" votes, decrying them as naive and reckless, an affront to U.S. troops.
"I was very disappointed to see Senator Obama and Senator Clinton embrace the policy of surrender," said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who called their opposition "the equivalent of waving a white flag to al-Qaeda."
McCain missed 46 straight Senate votes -- six weeks' worth -- before showing up Thursday to support the $120 billion war funding package.
Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.), another Democratic presidential contender, also opposed the funding bill. Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), also in the Democratic field, supported it.
... Campaigning in Iowa, Clinton defended her vote opposing the bill, arguing President Bush's policy isn't working. "I think it's important for someone like me who has been a strong supporter of the military and has worked hard to get our troops everything they need to start saying the best thing we can do is to get them out of the middle of this sectarian civil war in Iraq," she said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintoncrackup; defeatocrats; dhimmicrats; hillary; iraq; obama
Hillary 3 months ago stated that if she were president she would leave troops in Iraq. 30 days ago she was critical of the President but saw the need for troops in Iraq. Now she is ready to pull them. What happened?
1
posted on
05/26/2007 8:47:33 PM PDT
by
DBCJR
To: DBCJR
For finishing the War, we need to have Duncan Hunter as our next President and a Republican majority Congress.
2
posted on
05/26/2007 8:57:14 PM PDT
by
familyop
To: familyop
“need to have Duncan Hunter as our next President and a Republican majority Congress’
What if the Dems get back into power and leave us with another major military defeat?
This time it could set up a terror base funded by oil money that could lead to the destruction of the US. Thanks, Hillary.
3
posted on
05/26/2007 9:02:03 PM PDT
by
garjog
(Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
To: garjog
"What if the Dems get back into power and leave us with another major military defeat?
This time it could set up a terror base funded by oil money that could lead to the destruction of the US. Thanks, Hillary."
Yes, that could certainly happen, if we don't nominate someone with combat and Armed Services Committee experience. ;-) I'll submit a write-in vote, if the only choices are commies or soap stars.
4
posted on
05/26/2007 9:33:30 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt.--has been))
To: garjog
Oops. There was an HTML typo. My full reply is under the quote of yours.
"What if the Dems get back into power and leave us with another major military defeat?
This time it could set up a terror base funded by oil money that could lead to the destruction of the US. Thanks, Hillary."
Yes, that could certainly happen, if we don't nominate someone with combat and Armed Services Committee experience. ;-) I'll submit a write-in vote, if the only choices are commies or soap stars.
I've had it with the celebrity worship injected into politics and won't tolerate it any more. Our nation needs to stop thinking with its uterus.
5
posted on
05/26/2007 9:36:24 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt.--has been))
To: familyop
Some how I think that after New York, Miami and LA are nuked, us saying “we told you so,” won’t matter much.
6
posted on
05/26/2007 9:44:57 PM PDT
by
garjog
(Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
To: garjog
"Some how I think that after New York, Miami and LA are nuked, us saying we told you so, wont matter much."
If it weren't for a few truly decent, conservative friends in those places, I would gladly refrain from political speech for two or three years to make way for electing commies and soap stars. ...and gloat in anticipation. But from the looks of our nation's aversion to men and yearning for celebrities, it might be advisable to build private fallout shelters.
7
posted on
05/26/2007 10:03:37 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt.--has been))
To: familyop
Yes, or move to Alaska. I was thinking it might be a good idea to buy a condo in Sitka just in case.
This is far enough south that the weather is pretty mild, but would be removed from radioactive trade winds.
Somehow my wife doesn’t like the idea.
8
posted on
05/26/2007 10:12:06 PM PDT
by
garjog
(Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
To: DBCJR
I think it's important for someone like me who has been a strong supporter of the military I loath people who use to loath the military.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson