Same here.
For me, this sums up perfectly the situation both our nations face and why in both cases, the left simply don’t get it:
“I was stopped by someone the other week who said it was not surprising there was so much terrorism in the world when we invaded their countries (meaning Afghanistan and Iraq). No wonder Muslims felt angry.
When he had finished, I said to him: tell me exactly what they feel angry about. We remove two utterly brutal and dictatorial regimes; we replace them with a United Nations-supervised democratic process and the Muslims in both countries get the chance to vote, which incidentally they take in very large numbers. And the only reason it is difficult still is because other Muslims are using terrorism to try to destroy the fledgling democracy and, in doing so, are killing fellow Muslims.”
> a considerable part of media and public opinion continues
> to blame us for causing the extremism.
The extremism is hard-coded into their reference volume, the Koran.
They hate us because we are not Mahometans and because we do not impose Mahomet’s Sharia law upon our societies.
They hate us because we allow people not only to choose their own faith, but to practice it.
They hate us because we are pluralistic, tolerant societies that tolerate other points of view besides those found in the frothing droolings and foaming ravings of the mad pedophile Mahomet, a killer, a rapist, a plunderer, a pirate, a treachorous liar, a brigand, and a polygamist.
Laura Ingram summed it perfectly when she said that the Left’s “logic” can be summarized as follows. “We must not confront people that hate us and want to kill us because they might hate us and want to kill us.”