Posted on 05/27/2007 5:24:01 PM PDT by kellynla
Scientists on Sunday announced they had uncovered four more genes that play a role in breast cancer, widening the portrait of one of the stealthiest slayers of women.
Until now, only about 25 percent of the genes that are suspected to cause inherited breast cancer have been identified.
The new culprits -- flawed versions of genes called FGFR2, TNRC9, MAP3K1 and LSP1 -- are believed to account for an additional four percent.
British-led researchers found them after sifting through through the DNA of nearly 50,000 women, half of them healthy and half of them patients with breast cancer.
Telltale "tags" of DNA code among the breast cancer group highlighted the four genes.
Their study is published by Nature, the British science journal.
Genetic causes account for between five and 10 percent of breast cancer cases, with "lifestyle factors" such as smoking and environmental factors accounting for the rest.
Flawed versions of the four genes are common in the general population, the paper said.
The good news, though, is that the genes are considered a relatively low hazard, meaning that women who have them run a comparatively small risk of developing cancer.
By contrast, the notorious breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are relatively rare in the population but women who have them run a high risk of the disease.
Diagnostic tests for BRCA1 and BRCA2 are helping to save many lives, as they alert women at risk to have regular breast scans.
Because the four newly-identified genes are so common yet relatively low-risk, individual tests for them may be unsuitable, Cancer Research UK, whose scientists led the massive investigation, said in a press release.
However, "as more of these 'low-risk' genes are found it may be possible to design tests for a combination of genes," it said. "This could help doctors make decisions about prevention, diagnosis and treatment for women who inherit faults in one or more of these genes."
Much remains to be learnt about the four genes, especially whether they react with each other or with lifestyle factors in a way that boosts the risk for some women, it added.
Breast cancer is the commonest cancer to strike women, the World Health Organisation said in February 2006.
In 2005, breast cancer caused 502,000 deaths, accounting for seven percent of all cancer mortalities and almost one percent of all deaths worldwide.
Funny how they never seem to mention prostate cancer with is far more deadly.
Smoking is a lifestyle risk but abortion is not?
ping
You have to dig through reams of research to see who is paying for the results and how the data was slanted to get the desired results.
Science has gone pc...
Abortion is the cause celeb' on the left..It is the holy sacrament.
Breast cancer used to be a disease of older women..usually menopause plus..
It is increasingly becoming a disease of younger women..
When you start looking at causes...of course genetics will be there...If you have a Mother or a sister with cancer, your risk just went up tremendously.
Smoking has been on the decline since the 1970’s...so fewer and fewer women are smoking but it is always listed as a cause of cancer....They rarely mention that the risk is lung cancer, and bladder cancer and it is a significant to non cancerous cardiovascular disease.
What has been on the rise is abortions. The research with breast cancer typically has a cut off of 2 years post abortion. Abortion has been available for 30+ years. They can do a real retrospective study if they wished...
It would be similar in smoking studies to say all the cancer research is going to be based on only people that smoked for 2 years or less..
When you slant the study to get the results you wanted in the first place...It ain’t science any more.. It is garbage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.