[ColdWater]

That’s my point. You’re saying that a leading proponent of ID claims that “ID was dead.” That doesn’t make sense. A “proponent” advocates for something; he doesn’t say it’s dead and worthless.

No. He said "THE ID" was most probably dead since we have no evidence of "THE ID" interacting in man's evolution in the last few hundred million years.

[Theo]

Ah. I misunderstood “ID” to mean “Intelligent Designer” in every instance in your post. So apparently the leading advocate for Intelligent Design thinks that the Intelligent Designer is dead? That’s an odd position to have, that God is dead.

[Theo]

CORRECTION TO MY PREVIOUS POST: Ah. I misunderstood "ID" to mean "Intelligent Designer" in every instance in your post. So apparently the leading advocate for Intelligent Design thinks that the Intelligent Designer is dead? That's an odd position to have, that God is dead.