Posted on 05/29/2007 10:16:24 PM PDT by NapkinUser
Oh, I'm looking at what the man said.
The man said that we "incited" 911.
BTW, if Paul had a conservative foreign policy, CNN wouldn't be pushing him. It's the fact that Paul is right on small government and wrong on foreign policy that makes CNN wet its Republican splitting pants.
Then you post it! You post his words where he said that. It shouldn't be too hard...
Oh, I've posted the full context of what he said including the word "incite" numerous times. Before I do so for you, I will ask you one question.
Are you seriously going to tell me since it's so easy to find, that you didn't know that Paul used the word "incite" to describe 911 and our foreign policy?
I will check back for your answer.
Please ping me when you get it.
So I assume by your answer that you are another one who doesn't know that Paul used the word "incite".
"I'm the most conservative member in Congress when it comes to spending and taxation."
- Ron Paul, June 1, 2007
I guess the lure of socialism is tempting like the ancient sirens of Greek mythology.
So being 100% pro-life, 100% pro-border security, and 100% pro 2nd Amendment is liberal now.
Unbelievable.
Yeah, and he wrote that in his own feces on the wall. How 'bout let's cut the crap and get on the Fred bandwagon already ?
When he makes our RINO Cousin Rudy look sane and Conservative, he’s off in never-never land. But, yes, Dr. Demento is a moonbat, you got it. Senile paleokook loonytarians in Congress just ain’t cute. Nope, just ain’t cute at all.
I can’t tell who’s worse, Dr. Demento or his cultist supporters. But denial ain’t just a river in Egypt to these guys and Doc’s 9/11 moonbattery.
Very intelligent post there. You sound just like the people you're criticizing.
Thanks for disrespecting a man who has stood solid for the Constitution, who served in the military, who delivered babies and is pro-life, and who simply believes in a non-interventionist foreign policy as outlined by the Founders.
Why can't you and other Paul bashers politely disagree with his views on foreign policy. There's no need to resort to calling him a kook or bring up the Libertarian straw-man propaganda.
Yes, please cut it out.
I do not think Fred appreciates your campaigning for him with false statments and crude comments.
Naah, it's right on the money. The fact I have to spend more than 5 seconds giving any consideration to an embarrassing fringe-kook candidate who registers at about, what, 1 or 2% in the polls, is utterly ridiculous. It's hard to respect a figure who is so dangerously ignorant on foreign policy. I don't want that lunatic anywhere near ANY decisionmaking processes, period.
Naah, Fred would just get out the flyswatter and smash the gnat.
promote your man all you want. but let’s all try to give reasons and background information and facts and chains of events - remember that one? cause and effect? yes, whether you like it or not, there are consequences we cannot foresee when we take any action, including interfering with other countries.
seems a lot of people back their candidate the same way their candidates attempt to appeal to and play upon the voters: through emotion and reaction and negativity.
Post #114.
Thanks for proving my point. Like I said, you guys can't agree to disagree with Paul on foreign policy, you have to call him names and a kook too.
Admit it -- on some aspects of foreign policy, Paul is right. That's what scares the GOP establishment. I don't think he has a chance of winning either, but it's important to understand that he's in the race to discuss the real issues, and that's why he has support from a broad cross of the political spectrum.
Agree to disagree ? Rudy should’ve punched him in the mouth for such a shockingly ignorant comment. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from repercussions of shooting your dangerously ignorant and stupid mouth off.
And no, on no aspects of policy do I agree with this loon. The CIA messed up Iran in ‘53 installing the Shah ? Bull$hit. That was the greatest thing that ever happened to Iran, and dragged it kicking and screaming into the 20th century. Prior to Carter’s ABANDONMENT of the Shah, Iran was one of the most progressive (in the positive sense of the word) and modern societies in the Middle East, perhaps equalling Israel, before being plunged into the dark ages.
As for Dr. Demento having BROAD support (1% in the primaries), it’s “broadly” drawn from the moonbat extremes. Paleokooks, loonytarians, and their far-left brethren.
do you deny that when we are honest and fair with other countries, they feel drawn to us, begin to lean our way, even emulate us? do you deny that they can’t do that, when we’re threatening them and arming their neighbors?
i’d like to know. where is paul wrong on foreign policy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.