Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let's be Competitive — Free the Fed!
MoneyNews.com (Newsmax) ^ | May 30, 2007 | John Browne

Posted on 05/30/2007 9:47:17 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 last
To: Toddsterpatriot
The Federal Reserve system is made up of twelve Federal Reserve banks. According to the Atlanta Federal Reserve bank, "They were to be quasi-private bankers' banks, owned by the member banks, which would buy all the stock of the Reserve Banks and receive dividends for it.

Each of the Federal Reserve banks is a quasi-public (part private, part government) institution owned by the private commercial banks in the district that are members of the Federal Reserve system.

Federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of a Federal Torts Claims Act, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.

According to the Federal Reserve Act, a Federal Reserve bank is a special type of corporation chartered by the Federal government. Shortly after the act was passed, the United States was divided into twelve districts and a Federal Reserve bank was organized in each district. National banks (private commercial banks chartered by the Federal government) were forced to join the Federal Reserve system. State chartered banks could join if they chose, though most did not. Any newly chartered national bank must still join the system and existing or new state chartered banks can still choose to join.

One requirement of membership was for a bank to purchase stock in its district Federal Reserve bank. The amount purchased was fixed by the Act. Each member bank must purchase stock equal to 3% of its capital.

Take a bank's total assets — vault cash, loans, investments, building, and equipment. Then subtract its liabilities — checking accounts, savings accounts, bonds. The difference is the bank's capital, which, in banking lingo, is another term for net worth. Multiply by 3% and that is the dollar value of the Federal Reserve stock a bank must hold.

The par value of the Federal Reserve stock was fixed by the Act at $100 per share. As a bank's net worth changes and deviates from the 3% requirement, its Federal Reserve bank issues it new shares or buys back excess shares — always at the $100 par value. If any bank joins the system, its district Federal Reserve bank issues new shares. If any member bank fails, its district Federal Reserve bank pays off the shares.

All member banks are U.S. chartered banks — chartered by the federal government as national banks, or by one of the states. However, the stockholders of the various banks can be U.S. citizens or foreigners.

So, private investors, including foreigners, own the member banks which in turn seem to own Federal Reserve banks.

101 posted on 05/30/2007 4:38:31 PM PDT by rednesss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: rednesss
You really should include a link to your sources.

Did you ever admit your previous error, you know, "we pay the Fed $1 trillion each year"?

Yes or no?

However, the stockholders of the various banks can be U.S. citizens or foreigners.

So, private investors, including foreigners, own the member banks which in turn seem to own Federal Reserve banks.

Excellent! I knew that Bank of America stock would come in handy.

102 posted on 05/30/2007 4:48:29 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Hostage
The assertion that the Federal Reserve System was intended to control inflation is the opposite of the truth. The Fed's mission was and is to bring about inflation.

It is a fable that governments interfered with banking in order to restrict the issue of fiduciary media and to prevent credit expansion. The idea that guided governments was, on the contrary, the lust for inflation and credit expansion. Ludwig von Mises, Human Action.

See post 95.

103 posted on 05/30/2007 5:42:38 PM PDT by Christopher Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase

See Toddler, I can go back and look up old posts too. You said the market set interest rates today, but look at this old post of yours:

“The Fed “controls” short term rates. If they raise those rates, long term rates could drop.”

And boy did I have to wade through a lot of crap posts of yours to find this gem.


104 posted on 07/19/2007 1:11:23 PM PDT by richalessi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: richalessi
“The Fed “controls” short term rates. If they raise those rates, long term rates could drop.”

You found it, but do you understand it?

105 posted on 07/19/2007 1:13:22 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I’ll try a reply in your style, here goes:

“I understand that you love the federal reserve”.

How’d I do?


106 posted on 07/19/2007 1:16:32 PM PDT by richalessi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: richalessi
How’d I do?

You've shown you don't understand. But that was already obvious from the other thread.

Any luck finding out where the government announces what all the new rates will be, minute-by-minute, every day?

107 posted on 07/19/2007 1:23:48 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“Any luck finding out where the government announces what all the new rates will be, minute-by-minute, every day?”

Since you now admit that the Fed DOES manage interest rates, then you know that they published rate changes after fed meetings. No one but you (straw man argument) said it was minute by minute.

I’ll now await your trademark non-sequitur reply!


108 posted on 07/19/2007 1:30:02 PM PDT by richalessi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: richalessi
Since you now admit that the Fed DOES manage interest rates,

Sorry, I never said that.

Do you admit that rates are set by the market or do you still believe the following?

Interest rates should be set by the free market, as they were before the Fed.

Which is it, market or Fed?

then you know that they published rate changes after fed meetings.

All the rate changes? Or only a few?

109 posted on 07/19/2007 1:37:22 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson