Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

I read somewhere a recent quote from Thompson regarding McCain-Feingold; he all but said the law was a mistake. Then he wondered aloud about scrapping Mc-F and replacing it with a law that lifts campaign contribution limits and requires prompt public contribution disclosure on the internet.

To that, I not only say “Yes!” but “Hell, yes!” The answer to any campaign finance controversy is more freedom, not less. So remove the limits, require instant public disclosure. That way, the voters — and not some weenie incumbents — decide if a particular contribution is a problem.

I’m hoping Fred sticks to this course...it’s a winner.


17 posted on 05/30/2007 12:34:13 PM PDT by KingSnorky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: KingSnorky
Here ya go:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009798

Lot's of good stuff, but key quote:

Many on the right remain angry he supported the campaign finance law sponsored by his friend John McCain. "There are problems with people giving politicians large sums of money and then asking them to pass legislation," Mr. Thompson says. Still, he notes he proposed the amendment to raise the $1,000 per person "hard money" federal contribution limit.

Conceding that McCain-Feingold hasn't worked as intended, and is being riddled with new loopholes, he throws his hands open in exasperation. "I'm not prepared to go there yet, but I wonder if we shouldn't just take off the limits and have full disclosure with harsh penalties for not reporting everything on the Internet immediately."

27 posted on 05/30/2007 12:39:26 PM PDT by The Blitherer (If we take anything out of the pledge, take out the word “indivisible” and then kick out California.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: KingSnorky

That’s right - full disclosure.

Transparent and posted in a timely manner. Simple.

CFR not only attacked the First Amendment but they made it SO complicated. AND ironically, it weakened the parties but gave way too much power to Soros backed organizations etc.


37 posted on 05/30/2007 12:55:47 PM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson