I'd call you a Rudybot who hasn't been zotted . . . yet.
Does one get zotted for being an anti-rudybot? Because there is a hundred times more of that going on around here. No. I am not a rudybot. Not even really a pro anybody right now. In fact recently I posted that as a conservative I was liking Fred Thompson(for personal conservate reasons) but as a republican I was also liking Rudy(for hell I want the republicans to win reasons). See, I have been on this fusionism kick lately. In fact, I hadn’t been posting much to FR lately until I felt the desire to share my opinions of fusionism with FR after I found squat about it on the site and after I had read some good articles about the subject. Now if you know anything about fusionism then you’d have to ask how I could mention Thompson and Giuliani in the same sentence about it. Well I think Thompson is kinda Reaganesque in his potential ability to bring a lot of the party together for a presidential win. I think Giuliani is also able to bring the party together for completely different reasons. What confounds me is how, in this time of the divisiveness going on in the conservative movement, I am not hearing more from any faction on HOW to come together. Just the same ole infighting with the notable intensness of the social cons over their single issue of abortion and gay marriage. This is why I have started several threads about fusionism. What is ticking me off is I am seeing loads of social cons bashing anyone who disagrees with them(anti-giuliani to a man), with almost no small govt cons or fiscal cons weighing in with their povs on the where to take the party. The only other ones weighing in are the libertarians. If I get zotted its not because I am a Rudy fan, its because I had the audacity to not tow the social con line. Has FR become “social cons only” forum?