Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Madame Dufarge
Something is not right here. This is clearly discrimination against the chain restaurants in favor of the small restaurants. This does not sound legal to me.
12 posted on 06/01/2007 12:34:21 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Hal
Violators that do not comply with the requirements by Jan. 1, 2009, would be cited with an infraction, punishable by a fine not less than $50 and more than $500

Why go after all the little guys when you can shake down "Big Chain Restaurant" in one fell swoop?"

The Nannies already know from experience that "Big Chain Restaurant" caved to the smoking bans because they had the resources to hold out until the mom and pop businesses were ruined by them.

Competition gone, courtesy of the Nanny State.

The Nannies are going with the proven plan.

Maybe they'll pick up some money from "Big Chain Restaurant" in the meantime until full Big Brother compliance is realized.

13 posted on 06/01/2007 12:47:05 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson