To: SittinYonder
How?From the article....
And city officials say the brothers' action may lead to restrictions on carrying weapons on public property within city limits
There are better ways to promote the Second Amendment rights rather than going around scaring people.
22 posted on
06/01/2007 1:42:43 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(Global Warming is Leftist Theology - Why is it Being Taught in School?)
To: Responsibility2nd
There are better ways to promote the Second Amendment rights rather than going around scaring people. Kind of like this?
There are better ways to promote religous rights rather than going around preaching to people.
25 posted on
06/01/2007 1:47:02 PM PDT by
beltfed308
(Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
To: Responsibility2nd
There are better ways to promote the Second Amendment rights rather than going around scaring people. Scaring criminals seems like a good thing to me.
36 posted on
06/01/2007 1:52:26 PM PDT by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
To: Responsibility2nd
Wha?
When a citizen exercises their rights, they’re not “abusing” them.
And they’re not scaring anybody.
People with irrational fears are scaring themselves, and that is not a basis for restricting rights.
37 posted on
06/01/2007 1:52:46 PM PDT by
SJSAMPLE
To: Responsibility2nd
“And city officials say the brothers’ action may lead to restrictions on carrying weapons on public property within city limits”
If you restrict your ability to use your rights based on other peoples reaction to their use, you have already lost them.
To: Responsibility2nd
There are better ways to promote the Second Amendment rights rather than going around scaring people. The people scared need to get over it. It's a right. Deal with it.
199 posted on
06/04/2007 9:48:55 AM PDT by
Centurion2000
(Killing all of your enemies without mercy is the only sure way of sleeping soundly at night.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson