Right now, the agenda that’s being advanced is one that imports millions of illegal immigrants, millions of proto-islamic terrorists, outsources jobs, runs up billions of dollars of federal debt, reduces the quality of education yearly, and allows gays to advance a radical anti-family/anti-child agenda through the public schools.
And this is after 8 years of Republican rule. For your reasoning to be correct, this is where the country would have to be (or at least reasonably close to it).
I call BS. We’re clearly not as conservative a country as we were when Reagan was nominated. However if the GOP was to nominate Hunter and give him the money and platform to address the nation, he’d win a victory as big as Reagan’s and for the same reasons.
I think both parties are off the reservation when it comes to the immigration issue. And i agree with you. But I also don’t think a lot of issues that light he fire of the garden variety Freeper just aren’t that important to a majority of the electorate.
As for Duncan, he can’t even get Reagen-like numbers in a GOP primary, let alone a national election. He hasn’t broken from that 2nd tier of candidates, and he won’t.
That’s not to say he isn’t a good guy.