Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Incident Of Dumb Cops Arresting A Guy For Using An Open Wi-Fi Connection
Information Week ^ | Jun 1, 2007 | Mitch Wagner

Posted on 06/02/2007 1:03:33 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
Have you committed a Wi-Fi crime?
1 posted on 06/02/2007 1:03:38 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

Only while armed with a deadly weapon.


2 posted on 06/02/2007 1:07:41 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

No, I haven’t; but if the connection is free and this guy drives up everyday; don’t you think someone in the cafe would have noticed him? They probably knew what he was doing.


3 posted on 06/02/2007 1:09:57 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

In other news, several kids were taken to juvenile for water theft after running through a neighbor’s sprinker.


4 posted on 06/02/2007 1:11:33 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Duncan Hunter 2008 (or Fred Thompson if he ever makes up his mind))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty
A sane person stupid idiot would have knocked on Peterson's window and said, "Dude, I noticed you come here and sit in your car every day? What's up with that?"

This is pretty much the behavior of a stalker or someone who is up to no good. Calling the police was a reasonable action.

Milanowski ruled out Peterson as a possible stalker of the attractive local hairdresser, but still felt that a law might have been broken.

Far more likely is Peterson was actually stalking but they didn't have enough proof to charge him with the actual deed.

Have you committed a Wi-Fi crime?

No. And I don't drink out of other people's garden hoses or pick their flowers even if their land is not posted either.

5 posted on 06/02/2007 1:12:00 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Under advise from my lawyer I am now known as "Mostly Harmless Teddy Bear")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

I imagine they should start carrying a warning on all those devices you can get that search for/find open WiFi for you when you’re on the road.

What doesn’t quite wash is the cafe owner who said the guy could sit in there without ever buying anything. I seriously doubt that. No restaurant lets anyone sit in a seat and not ever buy anything, let alone make use of the free WiFi. If she was being truthful, my only guess would be she’s was desperate for business and wanted to look like the place was busier.


6 posted on 06/02/2007 1:26:35 PM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

If he is a Volly, then his community service is covered. was there a sign that only customers could use the wi-fi? Was there a banner on the access point telling non customers to go away and not trespass? If not I believe he would have won.


7 posted on 06/02/2007 1:27:47 PM PDT by Sam Ketcham (Amnesty means vote dilution, & increased taxes to bring us down to the world poverty level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty
Have you committed a Wi-Fi crime?

Actually, yes.

I was at the horse auctions up in Saratoga. I had to go up to Vt afterwards for business, so I got my laptop out of the trunk of my car to look at maps for the best route to take. (The maps are on my hard drive so I don't use the internet to do this.) While checking the maps, I noticed the little systray icon indicated I was connected. So I checked out FR for the latest news, and looked at my email to see if anyone wrote to me. This is a crime? If the people who have the connection do not want me to do this, they can either hide or encrypt the connection. Maybe it should be against the law to have an open connection thus tempting the unwary to check their email?

ML/NJ

8 posted on 06/02/2007 1:28:57 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I wonder how one can tell if a public wi fi connection is one where the sponsor does not care if passersby hop on from one that that the sponsor does care? There ar eboth kinds in my experience, but there is no clear way to tell


9 posted on 06/02/2007 1:29:59 PM PDT by PackerBoy (Just my opinion ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sam Ketcham
If not I believe he would have won.

Perhaps, if the judge/magistrate didn't go to the same schools as the cop and the prosecutor. If he did, probably thinks the same way.

"We came back and we looked up the laws and we figured if we found one and thought, 'Well, let's run it by the prosecutor's office and see what they want to do,'" Milanowski said.

10 posted on 06/02/2007 1:32:25 PM PDT by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Far more likely is Peterson was actually stalking but they didn't have enough proof to charge him with the actual deed.

I think it's more likely he had a bad attitude, and most likely a Ron Paul supporter.

11 posted on 06/02/2007 1:32:33 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

I’m a criminal, too.

I live in a complex and have my own wi-fi connection (with encryption). Just the other day, I noticed that I was “roaming” on other people’s wi-fis — because they didn’t bother to password protect.

There’s a half dozen or so open connections in my range.


12 posted on 06/02/2007 1:34:49 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

if the wi-fi is owned by the coffee shop, they would have had to have pressed charges. right? you need a complainant.


13 posted on 06/02/2007 1:35:24 PM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
"Far more likely is Peterson was actually stalking but they didn't have enough proof to charge him with the actual deed.

(snicker)

14 posted on 06/02/2007 1:35:59 PM PDT by Sam's Army
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

There is the spirit of the law and the letter of the law. What he did may have violated the law, but a simple warning could have sufficed here. The people should have this Chief removed. If crime is so low that the Chief had that much time to waste, then maybe the people don’t need a Chief. A security guard would do.


15 posted on 06/02/2007 1:36:38 PM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty
Moral of the story: Never tell the cops anything when they stop you without probable cause.

First, say "Am I under arrest?"

If the answer is "no," say "Am I free to go?"

If the answer is again "no," say "Am I being illegally detained?"

If you are not on your way within thirty seconds, tell them you want to speak to an attorney.

And never, ever, ever admit anything. Period.

16 posted on 06/02/2007 1:36:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
This is pretty much the behavior of a stalker or someone who is up to no good.

Not to mention the fact that he plays the bagpipes. Probably without underpants.

17 posted on 06/02/2007 1:37:37 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

I wouldn’t use someone’s phone without asking, why would I use their internet connection without asking?


18 posted on 06/02/2007 1:38:25 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

He was only using the Wi-Fi that Americans won’t use.


19 posted on 06/02/2007 1:41:21 PM PDT by Edgar3 (Steve Spurrier for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thanks! I printed this one out. I many needlepoint it onto a little pillow.

First, say "Am I under arrest?"

If the answer is "no," say "Am I free to go?"

If the answer is again "no," say "Am I being illegally detained?"

If you are not on your way within thirty seconds, tell them you want to speak to an attorney.

And never, ever, ever admit anything. Period.

20 posted on 06/02/2007 1:42:55 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson