Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rice: U.S. Not Preparing for War Vs Iran
Associated Press by way of Forbes ^ | 01JUN07 | ANNE GEARAN

Posted on 06/02/2007 6:13:56 PM PDT by familyop

The U.S. is not preparing for war against Iran and Vice President Dick Cheney supports that policy, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says, taking a swipe at a U.N. official who says he's worried about "crazies" who want to start bombing.

"The president of the United States has made very clear what our policy is. That policy is supported by all the members of his Cabinet and by the vice president of the United States," Rice said Friday.

"The president has made clear that we are on a diplomatic course," she said in regard to U.S. opposition to Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Rice, in Spain at the close of a European visit, was asked about the comments of the chief of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency. Mohamed ElBaradei was quoted by the BBC as warning against the views of "new crazies who say 'let's go and bomb Iran.'"

Cheney is frequently the administration's most hawkish voice on Iran, but Rice said she did not know to whom ElBaradei referred. The United States does not rule out military action but says there is no plan or intention to attack Tehran.

Cheney has not publicly advocated an assault on Iran, but he used the deck of an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf last month to warn Tehran that Washington would prevent the Islamic republic from dominating the Middle East.

Also stepping up pressure on Iran was President Bush, who demanded Friday that Iran "immediately and unconditionally" release four Iranian-Americans detained for alleged espionage and provide information about a former FBI agent missing in the country.

"I strongly condemn their detention at the hands of Iranian authorities," the president said in a written statement.

Rice was clearly annoyed by ElBaradei's remarks, which were part of an interview the International Atomic Energy Agency head gave for a documentary. The remarks were posted Friday on the BBC Web site.

Rice said the United States is using diplomacy to avoid "getting to a place where we have an unpalatable choice." She described that as a choice "between having to do something on the military side or allowing Iran to have a nuclear weapon. That's a choice that people talk about."

Rice, who has tangled with ElBaradei before, suggested he is giving Iran mixed signals.

"We have a diplomatic choice, but it's only going to succeed if we are absolutely clear with the Iranians - not muddying the message in any way," she said.

Iran is getting the right message from the U.N. Security Council, which has ordered two rounds of sanctions over Iran's nuclear program, and from the world at large, Rice said.

"I expect them to hear it loud and clear from the IAEA, and from its director," she said.

Separately, in what could be an attempt to delay the threat of new U.N. sanctions, Iran has pledged to cooperate with the nuclear monitoring agency probing its atomic program, according to an official speaking to The Associated Press.

That would end years of stonewalling by Iran and help the IAEA establish whether Tehran's past nuclear efforts were exclusively peaceful in nature.

At the White House, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley said Iran's defiance of U.N. mandates raises the prospect of a third U.N. resolution to increase pressure to suspend nuclear enrichment work.

While the U.S. continues its tough stance on Iran's nuclear program, Hadley said the United States agreed to talk to Iran about Iraq because the Iraqi government requested the meeting and because Iran's activities in Iraq are "killing our kids - our men and women in uniform over there."

U.S. and Iranian ambassadors held talks in Baghdad on Monday, the first formal ones between the two nations in nearly three decades. The two sides were to meet again in less than a month, but on Friday, Iran's foreign minister said, during a visit to Syria, they would continue "if the American side is willing to change its policies and is prepared to accept the realities in Iraq." He did not elaborate.

Rice's visit to Madrid was not connected to nuclear talks there Thursday between negotiators for Iran and the European Union. The talks ended without announcement of any breakthrough.

Rice is the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit Spain since a formerly close alliance turned frosty following the election of a Socialist government three years ago.

After hard feelings in Washington over Spain's quick pullout from Iraq and a dispute last year over Spanish plans to sell military equipment to Washington antagonist Huge Chavez of Venezuela, a fresh disagreement has threatened to wash away any growing good will.

At issue is Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos' decision to snub Cuban dissidents on a visit to Havana in April. Moratinos has defended the move, saying engagement with Cuba is the best policy.

When Moratinos predicted that in time Rice would see the value of his approach, Rice, listening to his remarks by translation on a headset, looked amused and unconvinced. As Moratinos continued to speak, she looked at the crowd of reporters and silently mouthed what appeared to be the phrase, "Don't hold your breath."

Associated Press Writers George Jahn in Madrid and Albert Aji in Damascus contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: condi; iran; nuclear; proliferation; rice; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: diverteach

LOL!


21 posted on 06/02/2007 7:30:05 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
The USA is READY for war with Iran (already at War with US).

Preparing began a while ago.

"In war, truth is the first casualty"
Aeschylus

22 posted on 06/02/2007 7:34:05 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: familyop

We’re trusting the word of a anti- US man named Mohommad.

This really is Jimmy Carter Part II.

Total fools are running our government.


23 posted on 06/02/2007 7:37:07 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (Dems will impeach Bush in 2008; mark my words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
The USA is READY for war with Iran (already at War with US).
Preparing began a while ago.

I know. I was commenting on commenting about Condi's commenting.

24 posted on 06/02/2007 7:37:08 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Actually I was corroborating you, but now I’ve a question.

You said, “And, as another benefit, saying that we are not
getting ready for “war” might spur a little more anxiety
among the Iranian students’ movement, leading them to think
that their inaction may not be productive.”

Why do that? Every delay hurts them.
Every taunt has hurt them. Key locations in
Iran should have been whacked yesterday for many reasons.


25 posted on 06/02/2007 7:45:16 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I certainly hope that is disinformation.


26 posted on 06/02/2007 8:00:39 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

It’s not. Iranian engineers have also been in N. Korea for tests.


27 posted on 06/02/2007 8:02:44 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. [(cbt.) has-been])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Actually I was corroborating you,

Yes, that's the way I took it.

Why do that? Every delay hurts them. Every taunt has hurt them.

Here, I am not sure if we are talking about the same thing.

Some people, like Michael Ledeen, believe that Iranian students' movement can somehow overthrow or bring down the mullahs' regime, given our (unspecified) support. I don't subscribe to his view, because I believe it would have happened by now. But it seems to me that they could be more helpful or more proactive if they don't think they can rely on us to do it... or, entirely contrary to that, if they could expect that our (or Israel's) delayed military reaction could prove too destructive. So this may just be another hint, incentive for them to become more active (even if in clandestine sense).

28 posted on 06/02/2007 8:16:05 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

10 Iranian Missile Engineers Visited N. Korea:Sankei reports(check on NK’s Chinese equipments)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1658850/posts


29 posted on 06/02/2007 8:19:46 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. [(cbt.) has-been])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: familyop
WHY NOT ???
30 posted on 06/02/2007 8:21:58 PM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Secretary Rice said before that she would not negotiate with the Iranian leadership, unless Iran stopped its nuclear development. Recently, she negotiated with Iranians in Baghdad...

US Has Two-Part Strategy With Iran
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1840813/posts

...after asking the Iranians to do so earlier.

Iran Stalls Over Attending Iraq Conference
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1793041/posts


31 posted on 06/02/2007 8:30:42 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. [(cbt.) has-been])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: airborne
"WHY NOT ???"

IMO...because many constituents in businesses (import, mostly) that depend on cheap freight fuel have been hounding our President's Administration to avoid conflict with Iran. Many of the same people are pushing a candidate for the Republican nomination--a man who knows very little about defense and will do as they tell him to do.

I'll probably write Duncan Hunter in for the general election, if I bother to waste my time and money to show at all.


32 posted on 06/02/2007 8:35:07 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. [(cbt.) has-been])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: familyop

You still have a plan.

You always have a plan.


33 posted on 06/02/2007 8:53:22 PM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: airborne
"You still have a plan.

You always have a plan.
"

That's true. We know that the Pentagon has warfare plans for various scenarios, too. But the political plans bug me.
34 posted on 06/02/2007 8:58:27 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. [(cbt.) has-been])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I used to like Dr. Rice.

And then she joined State Dept.


35 posted on 06/02/2007 9:00:54 PM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I think that Condi Rice is a very intelligent, gracious, attractive lady. She would have made a good VEEP for someone but her undying loyalty to the disappointing failure, Dubya, has tainted her prospects for any further involvement in politics after Jorge leaves office.


36 posted on 06/02/2007 9:07:07 PM PDT by no dems ( Dear God, how much longer are you going to let Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I think Secretaries Rice and Gates are well-informed and have the US’s best interests in mind.

I’m relieved at the news.


37 posted on 06/03/2007 1:01:49 AM PDT by AfterManyASummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1843491/posts?page=92#92


38 posted on 06/03/2007 1:07:13 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Thanks Cindy. Here’s another one.

Iranian Flow Of Weapons Increasing, Officials Say
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1843875/posts


39 posted on 06/03/2007 1:18:31 AM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. [(cbt.) has-been])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Thank you family op.


40 posted on 06/03/2007 1:20:43 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson