Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/02/2007 11:34:21 PM PDT by L.A.Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: L.A.Justice
">
2 posted on 06/02/2007 11:37:45 PM PDT by LFOD777 (In 2006, Washington spent $2.7 Trillion and ran a $248 billion budget deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice
Michael Savage: against

That's his natural status--against... everything.

3 posted on 06/02/2007 11:38:44 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-socialist Bostonian, Pro-Life Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

4 posted on 06/02/2007 11:39:57 PM PDT by LFOD777 (In 2006, Washington spent $2.7 Trillion and ran a $248 billion budget deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

Bill O’Reilly used to speak against border insecurity, not recently. Karl Rove must have worked him over.


5 posted on 06/02/2007 11:41:00 PM PDT by LFOD777 (In 2006, Washington spent $2.7 Trillion and ran a $248 billion budget deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

Glenn Beck Against
Jerry Doyle Against
Terry Anderson Obviously, Against


6 posted on 06/02/2007 11:44:30 PM PDT by BGHater (“Every little bit of good I may do, let me do it now for I may not come this way agai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

Michael Savage has been warning about unchecked illegal immigration since his radio debut in 1994. The rise in communicable diseases brought into the US was the subject of the first demo tape he sent out to radio stations. He saw Bush’s duplicity long before it was fashionable, and has been consistent and unwavering in his views all these years.


7 posted on 06/03/2007 12:25:50 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

The idea of penalties in the bill is funny because illegals would have to be caught or turn themselves in to face them.

That makes them a symbolic sham worthy of politicians, but no one of principle.

For starters, we need a border fence and increased security with a real and meaningful military presence.

On the issue of the 12-20 million there has to be some sort of crackdown without excuses.

But the pro-illegal crowd including the president and business leaders-politcial leaders should have tough questions to answer.

Is there a labor shortage with not enough people for the jobs?

If so, why?

Do abortion and “birth control” have anything to do with that?

Which of the pro-illegal business-political leaders have supported those policies (Planned Parenthood, etc) to create a labor shortage in our country?


8 posted on 06/03/2007 1:04:44 AM PDT by Nextrush ( Chris Matthews Band: "I get high....I get high.....I get high.....McCain......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

The one glaring flaw with Medved IMHO is that he has (inexplicably) always been soft on illegal immigration. I don’t understand it.


9 posted on 06/03/2007 1:13:46 AM PDT by SerpentDove (Club liberals, not seals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice
It is not just the 20 million illegals that I am concerned about, but what about their extended families who would be legally eligible to immigrate once these 20 million become US citizens. And I am speaking about extended families immigrating here, legally, without any restrictions or going through any immigration lottery. They have to be allowed to immigrate to the US, based on our current immigration policies, unless there are extenuating circumstances in their past, i.e. criminal, certain diseases, etc.

This has got to be the most crookedest bill I have ever seen go before Congress.

10 posted on 06/03/2007 2:11:43 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice
eeevil conservative- definately Against
12 posted on 06/03/2007 2:16:05 AM PDT by eeevil conservative (Duncan Hunter and John Bolton in '08!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

Dennis Miller: against, based on his belief that you shouldn’t break the law to come in, and you shouldn’t be placed in front of others who have applied legally.


13 posted on 06/03/2007 2:18:10 AM PDT by Silly (http://www.paulklenk.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

That Schnitt guy is against. I catch him some in the afternoon on XM 152 but he’s on in 5 or so terrestrial markets. Seems to be an honest to goodness conservative.


14 posted on 06/03/2007 3:26:02 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

Howie Carr (New England) definitely against

http://www.howiecarr.com


18 posted on 06/03/2007 3:39:17 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

Bill O’Reilly: Off handedly said “it’s the best(compromise) we’ll get” before going into a hard hitting segment on the body language of Rosie O’Donnell and a culture quiz.


19 posted on 06/03/2007 3:42:19 AM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

Bennett is against.


21 posted on 06/03/2007 5:57:16 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Al Qaeda knows Iraq's strategic value, yet the Democrats work day and night for our defeat there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

Neal Boortz—Against


23 posted on 06/03/2007 6:09:40 AM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice
I think the easiest, most easily remembered program about the amnesty bill is called "FEDS."

1) FENCE (build it)

2) ENFORCE (the law)

3) DEPORT (as many as you possibly can, many more will follow)

4) SANCTION (as many employers as you can. If businessmen perceive that there is a "level playing field," they will attempt to obey the law. It's when they think "everyone else is doing it, and I have to compete" that they break the law).

FEDS

Easy to remember, right to the point.

24 posted on 06/03/2007 7:17:46 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

I forgot...What is Dennis Prager’s position on this bill?


27 posted on 06/03/2007 11:12:22 PM PDT by L.A.Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

Mike Gallegher: Against


28 posted on 06/03/2007 11:16:02 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.A.Justice

John and Ken (L.A.’s KFI640.com) are the scrappiest fighters against the bill. They have listeners on freeways all over SoCal calling every phone number of Sen. Feinstein (and others they will spotlight) on this bill every afternoon. They get a lot of credit for walking the walk and not just talking. Great listening. I had no idea their timeslot competitor, the handsome Larry Elder, was for the bill. I don’t feel guilty not tuning him in, then.


31 posted on 06/03/2007 11:25:39 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson