Skip to comments.
Crowd cheers ex-Tenn. senator [Fred Thompson]
RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH ^
| Jun 03, 2007
| By JEFF E. SCHAPIRO
Posted on 06/03/2007 4:17:49 AM PDT by johnny7
Nearing a bid for president, former U.S. Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee last night tested themes for 2008, including a tough line on terrorism and immigration that brought Virginia Republicans to their feet.
(Excerpt) Read more at inrich.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: fredthompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To a standing ovation, Thompson said, "We've got to secure the border first. . . . This is our house, and we get to decide who gets to come into our house."
1
posted on
06/03/2007 4:17:50 AM PDT
by
johnny7
To: rightwingintelligentsia
2
posted on
06/03/2007 4:24:06 AM PDT
by
Sir Hailstone
(Mr. Thompson and Mr. Hunter - Protecting you against the pond scum of the universe.)
To: johnny7
Thompson said possible bipartisan consensus on the immigration bill represents a "disconnect between the people of this country and Congress like I've never seen before."
I can almost hear the dem panties knotting up...
Realizing FT is shooting out in front of the entire election process must be like a drug addicts withdrawal sickness.
3
posted on
06/03/2007 4:43:24 AM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: johnny7
His talk of seucring the border is what we all want. Tancredo has been after that for years. Did Fred bring up the issue when he was a senator?
To: Sir Hailstone; Tennessee Nana
Good morning, kind Sir; thanks for the ping!
Nana, weren't you at this event?
To: johnny7; Politicalmom
Great article, thanks!
Ping!
To: johnny7
Reading the article.. I’t like the reporter was forced to sit in a corner with a dunce cap on and write it. (Compared to the recent spate of anklebiting)
7
posted on
06/03/2007 6:33:02 AM PDT
by
xcamel
("It's Thompson Time!")
To: johnny7
Sounds to me like Freddy is finding HIS topic-—THE ISSUE-—of the 2008 campaign. Tie it into terrorism and “bing, bing, bing, Johnny, we have a winner!”
8
posted on
06/03/2007 6:48:17 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: LS
Tie it into terrorism and bing, bing, bing, Johnny, we have a winner!I think so too LS. I still like Hunter... but if Thompson runs, I'm going to listen to what he has to say. I like the way he winged-it with that YouTube response to Moore.
9
posted on
06/03/2007 7:03:07 AM PDT
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: johnny7
I don't think Hunter will even be viable as a veep. Face it: he just doesn't have any electoral clout. Six months and he's still at 1%??? Even a Mitt or a Thompson can't afford to have someone like that on the ticket.
My predictions took a hit in 2006 (but were damn good in 2004 and 2002) but I still think after the "shakeout," you'll see two of the "big four" team up---Rudy, Fred, Romney, McClame. And I'm guessing the final team-up will be Fred as Pres. and Mitt as veep. But we could, possibly, see a Fred/Newt ticket. I don't see a hope in hell of Newt winning the presidency, but if the veep is to solidify the base or bring in wayward states, Newt might do some of that.
You have to also think campaign: you cannot have two guys ever saying different things about immigration or WoT or whatever. So either the two have to be "simpatico" or one has to agree to shut up and let the other one talk (i.e., Bush with R. Reagan).
10
posted on
06/03/2007 7:13:59 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: johnny7
Their headline wrongly says he’s an ex-Tenn Senator. The story correctly says ‘former U. S. Senator’.
Ignorant savages.
11
posted on
06/03/2007 7:16:07 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: savedbygrace
In our local rag the Memorial Day Newspaper had a picture of Bubba and it said President Clinton. Bush is always Bush but to the rabid libs Bubba is still President.
12
posted on
06/03/2007 7:21:23 AM PDT
by
angcat
("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
To: LS
Newt will hurt whatever ticket he’s on... the DBM has destroyed him in the eyes of the sheeple. In fact, his ‘debate’ with Kerry on GW dropped him a couple of notches in my own assessment of his worth.
13
posted on
06/03/2007 7:23:16 AM PDT
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: johnny7
Fill me in on this “Debate”? Don’t know that I know what you’re talking about.
14
posted on
06/03/2007 7:24:13 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: LS
You won't see Fred/Newt. Candidates from two abutting southern states won't cut the mustard on the collard greens.
I agree with you that a distinct possiblity is Fred/Mitt.....in fact, the most distinct-est, LOL.
That is.....if Mitt would be willing to accept the lower role in the pecking order.
IMO, Newt and Rudy have too much personal baggage to make the A-list despite the hopes and denials of their supporters.
Leni
15
posted on
06/03/2007 7:27:08 AM PDT
by
MinuteGal
(The Freeper Caribbean Beach Resort Vacation Getaway,Thread is Up! Use keywords "FReeps Ashore".)
To: LS
Tie it into terrorism and bing, bing, bing, Johnny, we have a winner!Bingo.
16
posted on
06/03/2007 7:29:02 AM PDT
by
ncdrumr
To: LS
The ‘Global Warming’ debate they had...
17
posted on
06/03/2007 7:30:01 AM PDT
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: johnny7
18
posted on
06/03/2007 7:33:28 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: angcat
You’re not going to like hearing this, but he is just Bush to ME now.
He has dishonored the office by refusing to enforce the immigration and border laws for the past 6+ years, and the bill he’s now pimping will allow illegal muslim terrorists to remain here w/o fear of deportation.
If the Dims begin impeachment, I will not defend him for anything.
That’s how much I’ve turned away from him.
19
posted on
06/03/2007 7:35:12 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: savedbygrace
20
posted on
06/03/2007 7:37:01 AM PDT
by
angcat
("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson