Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC: Democrat hopefuls spar over Iraq
BBC ^ | Monday, 4 June 2007, 05:29 GMT 06:29 UK | BBC Staff

Posted on 06/03/2007 11:16:03 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Democrat hopefuls spar over Iraq

Sen John Edwards (left) makes a statement about Sen Hillary Clinton (right)

Candidates were divided over Iraq

The war in Iraq has divided Democratic party presidential candidates during their second head-to-head live TV debate ahead of the 2008 US election.

Exchanges between the eight hopefuls at the debate in New Hampshire featured repeated calls for a US withdrawal.

There were also clashes over whether President George W Bush had made the US safer from terrorism since 9/11.

New Hampshire will play host to the Republican party's candidates for their third televised debate on Tuesday.

The state will be the first to vote in national primary elections early next year, from which the Democratic and Republican candidates chosen to fight it out for the White House in November 2008 will be chosen.

'I was wrong'

Sunday's debate at St Anselm College in Manchester was moderated by CNN news anchor Wolf Blitzer, joined by Tom Fahey from local daily The Union Leader and Scott Spralding from TV station WMUR.

In the first hour of the two-hour debate, the candidates were each asked questions by Mr Fahey and Mr Spralding.

In the second half an audience of undecided New Hampshire voters took over.

New Hampshire voters talk about the candidates and big issues


The front-runners in the battle to win the Democratic nomination - New York Senator Hillary Clinton, Illinois Senator Barack Obama and former senator John Edwards - were among the first to clash.

Mr Edwards, who is trailing Senator Clinton and Senator Obama in the national polls, went on the offensive during the debate, attacking them both for a timid approach to enforcing President Bush to bring home troops from Iraq.

He said neither of them in their role as senators had spoken out loudly and clearly against legislation which failed to commit to a withdrawal date.

"There is a difference between leadership and legislating," he said.

Senator Obama responded to Mr Edwards's remarks by pointing out that he and Senator Clinton had voted in October 2002 in favour of the US-led invasion.

I opposed this war from the start, so you're about four-and-a-half years late on leadership on this issue

Senator Barack Obama

"I opposed this war from the start. So you're about four-and-a-half years late on leadership on this issue," said Senator Obama, who was not in the Senate in 2002.

"He was right, I was wrong," Mr Edwards conceded.

Senator Clinton continued to refuse to say her support for the invasion had been wrong at the time.

"That was a sincere vote," she said.

Nevertheless, she vowed to withdraw US forces and blamed President Bush for the current situation.

"This is George Bush's war. He is responsible for this war, he started the war, he mismanaged the war, he escalated the war and he refuses to end the war," she said.

'Bumper sticker'

The candidates also vowed to refocus the Bush administration's so-called war on terror, a day after US officials said they had exposed a plot to blow New York's John F Kennedy Airport.

DEMOCRATIC CONTENDERS

Bill Richardson

Joe Biden

Hillary Clinton

Chris Dodd

John Edwards

Mike Gravel

Dennis Kucinich

Barack Obama

Bill Richardson

After Mr Edwards called the war on terror a "political slogan, a bumper sticker", Senator Clinton said she disagreed.

"As a senator from New York, I have seen first hand the terrible damage that can be inflicted on our country by a small band of terrorists," she said.

"I believe we are safer than we were."

But Senator Obama said the war in Iraq had detracted from efforts to combat global terrorism.

"All of us are glad that we haven't had a terrorist attack since 9/11, and I think there's some things that the Bush administration has done well," he said.

"But, we live in a more dangerous world partly as a consequence of this president's actions."

Other topics discussed in the debate included the economy, immigration, national security, climate change and healthcare reform.

The BBC's James Coomarasamy says Sunday's contest was more free-flowing and substantive than when they first lined up in South Carolina in April.

But in general the Democrats remained keen to present a united front, perhaps none more so than Hillary Clinton who remains ahead in the national polls and seems likely to remain so after another assured performance, our correspondent says.

On Tuesday, the 10 Republicans seeking their party's nomination will debate the same top issues of the day.




TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008election; iraq

1 posted on 06/03/2007 11:16:06 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Democrat "Debate" Live Thread (Break out the popcorn, and the Tums.)
2 posted on 06/03/2007 11:17:20 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Hillary Thinking : "Keep pointing that finger, pretty boy. I'll have you slapped in a gulag so fast you won't have time for makeup."

3 posted on 06/04/2007 2:12:31 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson