Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TornadoAlley3
Normally I am filled with contempt for our legal system, but in this case it seems they got it just about right.

-ccm

4 posted on 06/04/2007 5:32:04 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ccmay

I agree with you. The jury system too often takes advantage of sympathy and results in outrageous verdicts; but there are times when it works.


12 posted on 06/04/2007 5:50:23 AM PDT by LantzALot (Yes, it’s my opinion. No, it’s not humble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ccmay
Normally I am filled with contempt for our legal system, but in this case it seems they got it just about right.

May I ask why? Not about your contempt, but why you think this is right........

14 posted on 06/04/2007 5:52:05 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ccmay

They got this right?:

“The jury found the Wal-Mart employee, Martha Watson Hookfin, 100 percent at fault, an unsigned verdict forum shows.”

So the the woman and her care takers have no responsibility to properly treat the wound to PREVENT the infection?

Once the infection set it, the hospital and her care takers had no responsibility to properly treat the infection/wound?

No responsibility on her part to take her meds? Were there any? (not mentioned)

Unless the walmart employee sprinkled her with bacteria then chained her down so she couldn’t get it treated, she is NOT 100% at fault...


27 posted on 06/04/2007 6:47:21 AM PDT by PissAndVinegar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson