Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/04/2007 5:43:29 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: SJackson
Chicago Tribune had it on page five.
2 posted on 06/04/2007 5:46:14 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
After all, the WOT is just a BUMPER STICKER SLOGAN..........
3 posted on 06/04/2007 5:47:28 AM PDT by Red Badger (Bite your tongue. It tastes a lot better than crow................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Is this a JOKE??? This story wasn’t on the FRONT PAGE?? NYT is Certifiably INSANE!


4 posted on 06/04/2007 5:48:47 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

It could be getting close to time for th NYT’s to get their favorite terrorism expert Larry Johnson to write another editorial on how terrorism is not a threat just like he did right before 9-11.


5 posted on 06/04/2007 5:49:09 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

6 posted on 06/04/2007 5:49:21 AM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The (inexplicably) most prestigious newspaper in the world put its bland story on page 30. Instead, page one featured yet another story about Guantanamo Bay detainees.

What else is to be expected from The Slimes? The front page is reserved for stories of our troops murdering innocents, and the evil President Bush spying on American citizens in the prosecution of his war for oil. I will rejoice the day The Slimes goes under.

8 posted on 06/04/2007 5:58:48 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Boycott the Times!


10 posted on 06/04/2007 6:02:08 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Page 1: “Muslim community bracing for backlash”.


11 posted on 06/04/2007 6:05:50 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
I'm sure the terrorists knew of this:

(Updated) BREAKING NEWS: Massive Series of Explosions rock Southern England, Sky News UK ^ | December 11, 2005
Posted on 12/11/2005 1:42:38 AM EST by Big Bad Bob

Reports of up to Four Explosions at a fuel depot Near Hemel Hempstead, North West of London, according to Sky
2005 Hertfordshire Oil Storage Terminal fire,
The 2005 Hertfordshire Oil Storage Terminal fire was caused by a series of explosions early on the morning of 11 December 2005. The terminal, generally known as the Buncefield Depot, is an oil storage facility located near the M1 motorway on the edge of Hemel Hempstead in Hertfordshire, England. These were some of the largest explosions ever to occur in the country, and the incident has been described as the biggest of its kind in peacetime Europe[snip]

The oil terminal supplied 30% of Heathrow Airport's fuel, and because of the fire, the airport had to start rationing fuel. Some long-haul flights to the Far-East and Australia had to "pit-stop" at Stansted Airport or other European airports to refuel, while short-haul operators were asked to fuel their planes for the round trip before flying to Heathrow. Fuel shortages continued for months after the explosion.



12 posted on 06/04/2007 6:06:59 AM PDT by syriacus ("...had the US troops remained [in S. Korea in 1949], there would have been no [Korean] War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

The New York Times: “All the views that fit, we print.”


14 posted on 06/04/2007 6:08:25 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
NY Times is more interested in providing cover for Muslim terrorists than in reporting about them.
16 posted on 06/04/2007 6:12:47 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Thanks for providing the information about the Times' coverage.

I used to get home delivery of the NY Times, but have bought it only about 2X in the last 3 years. I was actually thinking of buying a copy the other day, to read the news about this plot.

I'm glad I didn't bother to buy an issue.

17 posted on 06/04/2007 6:13:47 AM PDT by syriacus ("...had the US troops remained [in S. Korea in 1949], there would have been no [Korean] War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

I have no time to read stories on “Massive Terrorist Plots”. Please print important news like Paris Hilton going to jail. (sarc)


18 posted on 06/04/2007 6:19:12 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Some things never change about the NY Times — irresponsible journalism has corrupted the entire editorial board of the NY Times for years. No wonder the terrorist didn’t want to take out their building, because that would be taking out an ally!


19 posted on 06/04/2007 6:46:14 AM PDT by PhiKapMom ( Inhofe for Senate 08 -- Broken Glass Republican -- vote out the RATs in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
If people can't get the news from the New York Times, they will have no reason to buy the New York Times. They are digging their own graves with this kind of nonsense.
20 posted on 06/04/2007 6:46:59 AM PDT by gridlock (Fred Dalton Thompson will be the Next President of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The NYT somehow found room for a few front page stories on Abu Ghraib:

New York Times Streak of Page One Stories on Abu Ghraib ends at 32 Days! (UPDATED: 34 of 37 days)

21 posted on 06/04/2007 7:04:11 AM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

So many people believe this “It’s George Bush’s war against innocent people/Revenge for his daddy” crap that alot more innocent Americans will die before they get it. It will still questionable to some of them.

Where are the “moderate” muslims, you know the peace loving ones? Do they infact exist?


23 posted on 06/04/2007 7:54:42 AM PDT by Jaded ("I have a mustard- seed; and I am not afraid to use it."- Joseph Ratzinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Yes, and today's (Monday's) edition has the story buried in the Metro (B) Section, with a dismissive headline: Papers Portray Plot as More Talk Than Action. The "papers" referred to here are the papers filed by the prosecutor.

The front page of the Main Section has stories on:

Commanders Say Push in Baghdad is Short of Goal
Romney's Political Fortunes Tied to Riches He Gained in Business
Bloomberg Cast as Enemy No. 1 of Gun Rights
Former Leader Talks of Return to Pakistan and Maybe Power
Surge in Adoptions Raises Concern in Ethiopia
A Great Horse But Who Takes the Winnings.

24 posted on 06/04/2007 8:28:28 AM PDT by BusterBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

When the NYT editors downplay a threat to the lives of their readers, employees, and themselves, there must surely be beneficial side effects to suicide that the rest of us are overlooking.

Nitsie’s cavalier broadcasting of national security secrets implies they wish this same suicide for the nation. It can’t be because it’s profitable, because the paper loses money in spite of the perfidy.

It’s like there’s something about self-defense the NYT finds unpalatable.


25 posted on 06/04/2007 9:52:25 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

If the pipeline had gone up, would it be blamed on the terrorists? How many refineries have gone up lately?


27 posted on 06/04/2007 9:56:29 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson