Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time Warner: We'll Have Unlimited HD Capacity (TW stirs the HDTV debate at conference.)
tvpredictions.com ^ | June 5, 2007 | Philip Swann

Posted on 06/06/2007 2:16:43 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave

Washington, D.C. (June 5, 2007) -- DIRECTV says it can offer more than than 150 High-Definition channels next year after it launches two new satellites. But Time Warner boasted yesterday that it will have "virtually unlimited" high-def capacity by year's end.

That's according to an article by Multichannel News.

The publication reports that Time Warner Cable CFO Landel Hobbs told the Deutche Bank Securities conference in New York that DIRECTV has done a better job of marketing its future high-def prowess than Time Warner has.

But he said a new technology called Switched Digital Video will give cable operators such as Time Warner the capacity to offer as many or more channels than DIRECTV.

“Shame on us because we haven’t really done a good job of marketing it (HDTV)," Hobbs said, according to Multichannel News.

He said the Switched Digital Video system will be in place by year's end, giving Time Warner "virtually unlimited" capacity for high-def channels.

The SDV system allows cable operators to transmit only the channel the viewer requests rather than hundreds of channels at the same time. This enables the cable service to save system space and offer more choices.

Hobbs' remarks are likely to stir further debate in the high-def community over which TV provider will be the HD leader in 2008 and beyond.

DIRECTV next month will launch of the first of two satellites designed to increase its high-def capacity. The satcaster says it will offer 100 HDTV channels by year's end.

EchoStar, which now has more national HD channels than any other TV provider, says it will launch two new satellites at year's end to add more HDTV networks.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Interested in HDTV?
Please Freepmail (works best) me if you would like your name added to the HDTV ping list.

The pinged subjects will be those of HDTV technology, satellite/cable HD, OTA (over the air with various roof top and indoor antennas) HD reception. Broadcast specials and any and all subjects relating to HD.

Lasvegasdave

1 posted on 06/06/2007 2:16:46 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore; advertising guy; AJMaXx; american colleen; arbooz; auboy; BallparkBoys; bert; ...

Pinging the HDTV list...


2 posted on 06/06/2007 2:17:38 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave (HDTV ping list, please FReepmail me if you would like your name added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

whatever TW....

I think I only have 10 HD channels here in Houston.
and I have all the movie channels... (no HD sCINAMAX either!!!)

Still don’t have NATGEO in HD... I’d make the switch the sat if it didn’t rain :)


3 posted on 06/06/2007 3:29:59 AM PDT by fhlh (Liberal (noun): A person so open minded, their brains have fallen out of their head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhlh

Here in the Twilight Zone our CBS affiliate and TWC can’t even agree on terms for rebroadcast which made everyone who wanted to see the Super Bowl here mighty ticked off. The station is still promoting “See us free on Digital Channel 7!”
It’s a hoot! I still watch my $50. 18” set at the Cottage and it is just fine, thank you!


4 posted on 06/06/2007 3:54:55 AM PDT by Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shady

My TWC and local CBS affiliate still can’t come to terms either. All the other major network are already in HD. Despite promises to the contrary, both superbowl and march madness were broadcast in the same old muddy analog resolution.


5 posted on 06/06/2007 4:12:06 AM PDT by arkham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

>>But he said a new technology called Switched Digital Video will give cable operators such as Time Warner the capacity to offer as many or more channels than DIRECTV.

57 Channels and Nothing’s On


6 posted on 06/06/2007 4:24:49 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Ping for ON THE LIST, thanks!


7 posted on 06/06/2007 5:21:38 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Still waiting to join the HD bandwagon. Prices for TV’s have come way down but the channel lineup is still not good. Looks like early next year will be the time to jump in.


8 posted on 06/06/2007 6:48:57 AM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Ok, that’s good TW. But when? And are you going to get the NFL Network and Sunday Ticket soon too. You all are on the clock to show some results because by September if the above does not happen with TW in my town, I’m gone to Direct TV.


9 posted on 06/06/2007 7:04:06 AM PDT by The South Texan (The Drive By Media is America's worst enemy and American people don't know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

yada, yada, stop the bleeding to DTV, blah, blah, blah


10 posted on 06/06/2007 7:01:53 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution ? 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Wonder how long it will take to switch channels??? 5 seconds?? Not worth it...


11 posted on 06/07/2007 8:40:49 AM PDT by BallparkBoys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

I am not as concerned about the number of channels. I am concerned more with how much they are compressing the few channels I want to watch. My hope is that if they really do have lots of bandwith they will use that space to give us nice high quality hi-def.


12 posted on 06/07/2007 8:49:49 AM PDT by krb (If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krb

That’s the big question. As of now, the best way to get high def is over the air. It’s free and the picture quality is superior to satellite or cable.


13 posted on 06/07/2007 8:57:40 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (I'm Fred, White and Blue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BallparkBoys

If they’re smart they’ll rig the system so it does intelligent filtering. When you’re watching a channel they really won’t be just sending that channel they’ll be sending the 2 or 3 channels on either side, that way if you use the channel up or down buttons you’ll get instant change. And when you engage a channel change by the numbers they can make “guesses” so if you hit 5 it can start sending all channels that start with 5 (5, 50-59, etc). And if you bring up the guide they can start sending all of the channels that are currently listed on your screen. There’s enough room in the cable bandwidth for 20 or more full HD channels if that’s all they’re sending to your box, that’s more than enough to make the selective send transparent when you change channels if they make the system smart enough.


14 posted on 06/07/2007 9:07:46 AM PDT by discostu (only things a western savage understands are whiskey and rifles and an unarmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: discostu
>There’s enough room in the cable bandwidth for 20 or more full HD channels if that’s all they’re sending to your box, that’s more than enough to make the selective send transparent when you change channels if they make the system smart enough

What if the software
is written by programmers
paid by Microsoft?
15 posted on 06/07/2007 9:11:13 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Then it would be down to 10, but the channel guide would be in those funky see through window things that apparently the people at MS think are really cool.


16 posted on 06/07/2007 9:13:03 AM PDT by discostu (only things a western savage understands are whiskey and rifles and an unarmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson