Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ovrtaxt
But Texas Rep. Ron Paul, a candidate drawing about 2 percent in opinion polls, opposed a nuclear strike on moral grounds and because he believed Iran was no threat to U.S. national security. "We, in the past, have always declared war in defense of our liberties or go to aid somebody," Paul said. "But now we have accepted the principle of preemptive war. We have rejected the just war theory of Christianity."

His ignorance of the goals of radical Islam is appalling.

This isn't 'pre-emptive' in the sense that Augustine speaks of an unjust war. It's a pre-emptive strike to head of the ESCALATION OF A WAR THAT'S ALREADY UNDERWAY.

There's absolutely nothing unjust about self defense.

2 posted on 06/06/2007 5:05:33 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (I would rather vote for Lindsay Lohan than Lindsey Graham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ovrtaxt
This isn't 'pre-emptive' in the sense that Augustine speaks of an unjust war. It's a pre-emptive strike to head of the ESCALATION OF A WAR THAT'S ALREADY UNDERWAY.

If you're saying that Iran is waging a proxy war against us in Iraq, then you have a good point. I tend to agree, especially since Iran is led by a lunatic.

7 posted on 06/06/2007 5:51:55 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson