Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

E-Mail Senders Can Pay to Bypass Filters
(AP) ^ | Jun 6 | ANICK JESDANUN

Posted on 06/06/2007 8:55:53 AM PDT by george76

Four more Internet service providers will start charging banks, e-commerce sites and other large e-mail senders for guaranteed delivery.

In deals expected to be announced Thursday, Goodmail Systems Inc. is expanding its CertifiedEmail program to Comcast Corp. (CMCSA), Cox Communications Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC)'s Road Runner and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) Yahoo Inc. (YHOO) and Time Warner Inc. (TWX)'s AOL became inaugural participants last year.

Individuals, businesses and organizations will be able to continue sending messages for free, but they risk finding those missives caught in increasingly aggressive spam filters.

With Goodmail, a company can pay a quarter of a penny per message to bypass those filters and reach inboxes directly. Recipients see a blue seal verifying that the message is legitimate; senders get confirmations and can resend messages lost in transit.

Non-profit groups can participate, too, at about a tenth of the commercial rates.

At least half of the fees go to the service provider, Goodmail Chief Executive Richard Gingras said.

For now, Goodmail will approve only companies and organizations in existence for at least a year, to thwart fly-by-night operations. Those that have prompted too many spam complaints will be disqualified.

The service is designed to certify credit card statements, e-commerce receipts and other communications with existing customers. It does potentially give a boost to larger corporations and groups that can afford the charge, but Gingras says their messages are the ones most likely to be mischaracterized as junk.

Peter Castleton, Verizon's director of consumer broadband services, said his company would still let senders apply for "whitelisting" - and thus bypass filters as well - without charge. Goodmail's service, he said, is for those that want approval at multiple ISPs at once.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: email; emailsenders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/06/2007 8:55:54 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

This gets rid of indiscriminate spam (they’re not going to pay even a quarter of a cent to send out billions of herbal Viagra ads), but it still means that those willing to buy targeted lists will have a more effective way of clogging inboxes. A quarter of a cent is a bargain compared to what it takes to send junk snail mail. And look how much of the latter you still get!


2 posted on 06/06/2007 9:04:36 AM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

Technology solves the problems of technology. by end of summer someone will be selling software which cuts off the by-pass. by year end (or earlier) it will be a free download. freedom works...


3 posted on 06/06/2007 9:07:17 AM PDT by APRPEH (Hillary probably wouldn't approve, but I can live with that.... www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76; hunter112

The only “filters” they can bypass are the ones in the Comcast, et al routers. The personal filters installed on your PC will still “take them out”. Yet another argument against “network computing” and for “my machine on my desk” computing.


4 posted on 06/06/2007 9:08:07 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

What good is a “filter” if it has a “hole” in it?.........


5 posted on 06/06/2007 9:09:57 AM PDT by Red Badger (Bite your tongue. It tastes a lot better than crow................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Yet another argument against “network computing” and for “my machine on my desk” computing.

Damned individualist......You will be sent to the re-education camps immediately!.......check your e-mail for when / where to report........

6 posted on 06/06/2007 9:11:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (Bite your tongue. It tastes a lot better than crow................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Yet another argument against “network computing” and for “my machine on my desk” computing.

Um, you can use filters on "network computing", too, and in that case, the data never even goes over the line to your terminal, whereas in the "machine on my desk" case, you still receive it, only to junk it.

7 posted on 06/06/2007 9:12:16 AM PDT by kevkrom ("Government is too important to leave up to the government" - Fred Dalton Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; ..

8 posted on 06/06/2007 9:12:34 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I guess it depends what kind of mail pickup you use.

I use Outlook Express to sweep all my accounts with pop3 or Imap, and I have my own spam filter to deal with the messages I get. I prefer not to have my email providers do the filtering, because frankly I don’t trust their filters not to filter out valid messages.

If I have an account like Amazon or my broker that I don’t want filtered, I whitelist it myself. Then if Walmart or Sears wants to send me junkmail and pays this new company for the privilege, who cares?


9 posted on 06/06/2007 9:13:26 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
What good is a “filter” if it has a “hole” in it?

The fundamental problem with spam is not that it's annoying, but that the sender is using someone else's resources to send their stuff. If the sender wants to pay to use those resources, then that solves the fundamental problem.

Annoyances can still be solved by personal filters.

10 posted on 06/06/2007 9:13:42 AM PDT by kevkrom ("Government is too important to leave up to the government" - Fred Dalton Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

By definition filters must have holes or nothing (including what you want) would get through. Filters need let some things through, what you are asking for is a brick wall.


11 posted on 06/06/2007 9:15:05 AM PDT by PissAndVinegar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76

They can guaranee delivery all they want but as long as I can configure local rules on my client and, save that, retain the DELETE function, they can never penetrate my defenses. HA HA HA.


12 posted on 06/06/2007 9:15:37 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (Enough of this, already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PissAndVinegar

I work with 4 types of filters everyday.....High Pass, Low pass, Band Pass, and coffee.........


13 posted on 06/06/2007 9:17:57 AM PDT by Red Badger (Bite your tongue. It tastes a lot better than crow................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
"Um, you can use filters on "network computing", too, and in that case, the data never even goes over the line to your terminal, whereas in the "machine on my desk" case, you still receive it, only to junk it."

It still gets sent from the Comcast server to the server of your network, though. YOU (or your company) still has to do the job.

14 posted on 06/06/2007 9:30:55 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"Damned individualist......You will be sent to the re-education camps immediately!.......check your e-mail for when / where to report........"

Gasp--you've outed me. How will I survive??

15 posted on 06/06/2007 9:31:46 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: george76
ISP filters are mostly useless anyway. That’s why you need to set up a good basic spam utility like McAfee, and then maintain the address book carefully. It solved 99% of my spam problems.
16 posted on 06/06/2007 9:31:50 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PissAndVinegar

Looks like we need one of those “No Holes” filters on the border!


17 posted on 06/06/2007 9:35:01 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: george76

Lame


18 posted on 06/06/2007 9:45:51 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Good point. I use MailWasher, myself. It does a great job of pre-managing spam for me.


19 posted on 06/06/2007 9:52:03 AM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: george76

First step towards regulation.


20 posted on 06/06/2007 9:53:10 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson