Saddam Hussein's Philanthropy of Terror
Note the date on the pic to the right.
Posted on 06/06/2007 9:07:32 AM PDT by drzz
Excerpt from the talking leading to the Homeland Security Act of 2002.
Senator Holling, (D-South Carolina) quoted an Iraqi newspaper's article of July 21, 2001, to give examples of warning shots that could have been understood by US intelligence agencies in order to prevent 9/11.
IRAQI PAPER / WARNING SHOT / 9-11
Who said Iraq had no ties with A-Qaeda ? Was not aware of 9/11 ? Was not involved in 9/11 ?
-----------------------------------------------------
(EXCERPT)
Here is a news story from July 21, 2001, before 9/11 of last year, in the Iraqi news. The name of that particular newspaper is Al-Nasiriya.
Quoting from it:
"Bin Ladin has become a puzzle and a proof also, of the inability of the American federalism and the CIA to uncover the man and uncover his nest. The most advanced organizations of the world cannot find the man and continues to go in cycles in illusion and presuppositions."
It refers to an exercise called ``How Do You Bomb the White House.'' THEY WERE PLANNING IT. Let me read this to all the colleagues here:
"The phenomenon of Bin Ladin is a healthy phenomenon in the Arab spirit. It is a decision and a determination that the stolen Arab self has come to realize after it got bored with promises of its rulers; After it disgusted itself from their abomination and their corruption, the man had to carry the book of God . . . and write on some white paper ``If you are unable to drive off the Marines from the Kaaba, I will do so. It seems that they will be going away because the revolutionary Bin Ladin is insisting very convincingly that he will strike America on the arm that is already hurting."
In other words, the World Trade Towers. Here, over a year ahead of time IN THE OPEN PRESS OF IRAQ, THEY ARE WRITING THAT THIS MAN IS PLANNING NOT ONLY TO BOMB THE WHITE HOUSE, BUT WHERE THEY ARE ALREADY HURTING, THE WORLD TRADE TOWERS. I ask unanimous consent to print this article in the Record. There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in the Record
SEE ALSO VIDEOS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwD3DCiIpO8&eurl=
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1sx7x_saddams-secrets
AND 1999 ABC NEWS DOCUMENTARY
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1840395/posts
Manhattan Federal Judge Harold Baer, a Clinton appointee, found enough evidence in the Butler report in regards to Salman Pak to find Saddam Hussein to have been in material support of the 9-11 highjackers.
Post 9-11...............
Well after BJ ClinTOON dropped 400 cruise missiles on WMD sites in Iraq.
The article quoted here is dated July 21, 2001.
I mean the Iraqi article, of course.
The Senate talkings about the Homeland security Act were held during the Summer of 2002.
Only in forums like this do the actual words of Democrats appear and show the rank hypocrisy required to be a Democrat in good standing.
Which is why the dinosaur media outlets are dying.
JFK was a nut. I hate him.
He was a John Kerry before the hour. He abandonned his men at the Pigs Bay, he refused to fight communism and even said during the Summer of 1963 that America had to see its own system of values before giving lessons to the USSR.
Truman was the last true American AND Democrat.
Democrats hate democracy. Because in democracy, there are so many people who ask for prooves and not empty speeches.
I might add Ed Koch to that group.
Koch has gone back to his old ways, he’s supporing Hillary! for POTUS.
ping
Were the democrats lying then or lying now?
Yes.
There are several documents with various dates referenced.
The senate vote was
..WAIS Document Retrieval[Congressional Record: September 12, 2002 (Senate)]
[Page S8521-S8535]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.