Posted on 06/06/2007 12:41:35 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Related shocking news stories:
- People who plan for retirement have more money in later years than people who don't!
- People who have more money can eat at more expensive restaurants!
- People wearing the finest clothing are RICHER than those wearing Walmart duds!
(Raising hand) And who would get to decide which people have to lose what they own, Mrs. Clinton?
I am looking forward to making rude jokes about the lady.
In any state suffering under anarchy, there is always an abundance of jokes which are quite illegal to tell.
Because, as things stand, somewhere around half of the ‘voters’ in this country will vote for her under ANY circumstances.
***That’s what’s scary. It’s not Hildebeast. It’s the ignorance of the voting bloc that supports her.
Her reply, “And your name is...”
The most successful economy in 50 years or so and it’s somehow failed?
These socialists are beyond ridiculous.
I became more conservative during my last year of college, and have become even more so since. I’ve never voted for a ‘Rat for anything, on any level.
As much as I’d like to jump on the Hillary-is-a-communist bandwagon, I heard this exchange and what she was talking about was people giving up parts of their stance on the issues in order to find “common ground.” The part where she said “Something Has to be Taken Away from Some People” came as she was being hurried to end her comments. When I heard her say that I knew I’d see a story like this. I’m sure she really believes in taking things away (I remember the 2004 comment) but in this instance the headline is out of context with her comments.
Going to be lots of great ads if Hillary wins the Democrat nomination.
Last poll I read said 53% of thepeople WILL NOT vote for her under any circumstances.
The caesars of this world always keep what is theirs. Lest we forget, Julis Caesar was a populist.
Her negatives have never dropped below 40% and they are now nearly 50%... She’s unelectable and the DNC knows it.
***It’s quotes like this that make mincemeat out of candidates. But unfortunately, the media likes her, so they’ll be providing some cover. I sure hope she’s Michael Dukakis in a dress — she doesn’t have half the charm of her HINO.
I like the way she says, "not give it to YOU." or "we'll take it away from YOU for the common good."
and so I ask, What is going to be taken from YOU, Hillary?"
You commie can give up your dollars first
If that means taking oil away from the Arabs, it is fine with me.
I wonder if she would be receptive to a proposal to limit Congress’ benefits to those of social security retirement benefits, and medicare benefits.
I wonder if she would support a limit on Congressional salaries to mirror those of the average worker in America.
I wonder if she would support drilling for oil off the Florida beaches.
How about Clinton/Chavez in 2008?
Catchy.
Of course Chavez could be a problem as:
(1) he is not a USA citizen.
(2) Clinton might view him as a bit too moderate for her.
I just got into a debate with a liberal goofball and the person asked me this question (no, I’m not making this up):
“In order to provide for a common Defense, is not money taken away from you to provide for this?”
A look inside the criminal mind. Run Hillary Run!
The common defense is actually one of the few things the guv should be taking money from us to provide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.