Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stayfree

I understand but this seems different. Paying money to the SA Amb to the US for 20 years. I wonder if this is coming out now because relations with SA have become so bad? Probably a lot of intriguing details we will never hear about.

Take a look at the timeline.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6182137.stm

Looks like the investigation was started and then stopped before it was finally opened again.


12 posted on 06/07/2007 4:39:55 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: leadpenny

Unless BAE Systems is a wholly-owned subsidiary of a domestic stock corporation, all of which are covered by U.S. law forbidding such practices, no U.S. law has been broken. Since it appears that the UK has a similar law, then it looks like both BAE Systems and the Ministry of Defence have a problem in the UK. Imagine if the Pentagon approved such an arrangement to a U.S. defense contractor.


13 posted on 06/07/2007 6:49:57 AM PDT by Stayfree (*************************Get your copy of The Fred Factor by David Gill at Capitol Hill Comedy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson