[Red Boots]

Do not underestimate the threat to the nation Obama poses. He is probably a more formidable general election candidate than Hillary - he's further left than she is and does not have her negatives.

He is dangerous, I agree. But Hillary, with the clinton operatives all over the government, might be more dangerous. If they don't support him, he might be so governmentally inept, that nothing could be done. That might be better than the H and all her connections.

I hope and pray it doesn't come to that, but it's something I think about.

[CatoRenasci]

But Hillary, with the clinton operatives all over the government, might be more dangerous. If they don't support him, he might be so governmentally inept, that nothing could be done. That might be better than the H and all her connections.

I agree that Hillary in power might be more dangerous than Obama in power; however, I think the likelihood of Obama winning the election would be subtantially greater than Hillary winning the election.

Between them, Obama and Hillary are the greatest threat to the nation since Robert Kennedy in 1968.

[hinckley buzzard]

He is dangerous, I agree. But Hillary, with the clinton operatives all over the government, might be more dangerous

Yes. The Clinton machine is a cancer with malignant roots anchored deep within the tissues of the body politic--hillary is merely the visible surface tumor. Radiation/chemo/radical surgery all will be called for should the cancer get the upper hand.