Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Immigration and Black Unemployment, Congressional Black Caucus Remains Silent
Diverse Online ^ | May 22, 2007 | Dr. Carol M. Swain

Posted on 06/07/2007 7:40:16 AM PDT by 3AngelaD

"The interests of American citizens should trump any obligations to illegal immigrants who have willfully broken the nation’s laws and demanded rights and privileges not guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution."

In the new book Debating Immigration, I criticized the Congressional Black Caucus for its failure to take a leadership role in reforming the nation’s immigration laws. A perusal of the CBC’s Web site and press releases during the 109th Congress revealed that the issue was not listed among its legislative priorities, nor had the organization, traditionally concerned with jobs and education, acknowledged the negative impact that high immigration rates has had and is continuing to have on members’ districts. When the CBC finally addressed the issue in the 110th Congress, its official position placed the organization firmly in favor of amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants and for a guest worker program that would bring in even more immigrants to compete with Blacks and other low-wage, low-skill workers for housing, health care, education, employment opportunities and goods and services.

We need only focus on unemployment to get an idea of how Blacks and other groups are adversely affected by high levels of immigration. Consider that Black unemployment rates are usually double the rate of Whites and are higher than the rates of Hispanics. For example, in April 2007, the national unemployment rate was 4.5 percent. The Black unemployment rate was 8.2 percent, with the rate for Black males at 9.7 percent. The rate for Hispanics was 5.4 percent...

Employed African-Americans include a disproportionate percentage of high school dropouts and graduates who compete directly with legal and illegal immigrants for low-wage, low-skill jobs. Immigrants arriving since 1990 have increased the supply of labor by 25 percent for the kinds of jobs traditionally taken by poorly educated Americans. Using data from 2000-2004, Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies has found that while immigrant workers constituted 15 percent of the U.S. labor force, they were a whopping 40 percent of workers without high school diplomas. Only 12 percent had greater than a high school diploma.

The greatest competition for low-skill jobs is now occurring among people at the margins of society, a multiracial group that includes poorly educated Blacks, Whites and Hispanics. It is no wonder members of the working-class are the ones most upset about high levels of immigration.

Whether the topic is education, poverty, housing, health care or unemployment, Blacks remain clustered at the bottom of the ladder in a most desperate situation. Therefore, their need for representation in Congress is on-going — the more vigorous, the better. The CBC has not been an effective voice on unemployment and related issues such as immigration...

African-Americans should expect and demand more from the CBC, because its members have chosen to organize as a racial caucus. By doing so, CBC members have placed upon themselves the obligation to represent the interests of the millions of Black constituents who have faithfully and repeatedly sent them to Washington...

Often, these immigrants show open hostility and disdain for African-Americans, the very group whose civil rights movement have and continues to benefit them enormously...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; immigrantlist; immigration
Dr. Carol M. Swain is a professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University. She was on Lou Dobbs last night and is very impressive. The Congressional Black Leadership's position on this issue is a crying shame. They are betraying the very people they purport to represent.
1 posted on 06/07/2007 7:40:19 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Ummm. I don’t think so. They can’t complain if they get parity. Illegals taking jobs they might will be reserved for a later complaint that whitey is keeping them surpressed.


2 posted on 06/07/2007 7:46:23 AM PDT by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Don’t forget - even in the Congressional Black Circus, liberalism trumps all else.


3 posted on 06/07/2007 7:47:01 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Therefore, their need for representation in Congress is on-going — the more vigorous, the better. The CBC has not been an effective voice on unemployment and related issues such as immigration...

The professor does not understand the dynamic here. Illegals are an underclass. Their children will be citizens. The children of the underclass are reliable leftist voters. The CBC and the rest of the left will grow and prosper as this new generation from the underclass starts voting.

For most politicians, power trumps any interest they have in helping their constituents.

4 posted on 06/07/2007 7:50:50 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

And what’s the response from other black “leaders” - Sharpton, Jackson, even the outspoken rappers?

.... crickets ....

They scream like hell when Michael Richards says one word, but when they REALLY ARE being betrayed, silence.

Go figure.


5 posted on 06/07/2007 7:53:17 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Black caucus reps are generally in heavily black districts and consider themselves invulnerable. My Rep is Lacy Clay. In my e-mail to him, I pointed out that his father chained himself to the bank doors and risked his life for the betterment of his people. Lacy chained himself to-what?, and risked nothing.
The CBC has not on eball among them.


6 posted on 06/07/2007 7:53:36 AM PDT by steve8714 ("A man needs a maid", my ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

The CBC is interested in political power for themselves. They don’t give a damn for average blacks, other than their votes. They see amnesty and citizenship for 20-30 million illegal aliens as more Democrat votes to ensure their grasp on power no matter what hardship it puts on displaced black American workers. They know that very soon there will be millions more Hispanic Democrats than black Democrats, mostly in their urban districts, so their retention of power will depend on the Hispanic vote - screw their fellow blacks.

Ironically, the CBC will be treating their core constituency, the one that put them in power, just like the Republicans treat their core constituency on the immigration issue.


7 posted on 06/07/2007 7:56:31 AM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Snoopers-868th
What is that supposed to mean? Don't blacks who are American citizens have the right to expect their government will look out for their best interests? Don't all citizens? Black people in this country have been screwed by our immigration laws over and over, going back to the last half of the 19th century. Everytime the labor supply was such that they started getting ahead, the government opened the floodgates and brought in millions of foreigers to compete with them for jobs, and drive down wages. The time they made the fastest economic gains was the period between the 1930s and 1965, when regular immigration quotas were kept at all time lows.

I particulary didn't understand this, "Illegals taking jobs they might will be reserved for a later complaint..."

9 posted on 06/07/2007 7:57:01 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They've screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Hey, it looks like your keyboard dried out. You’ll have to kee=p= the kids/=p=ets away from it. ;-)


10 posted on 06/07/2007 8:01:16 AM PDT by 300magnum (God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it. D.Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Sharpton and Jackson spoke at one of the I rallies at Union Sq. here in NY. They said ‘It’s the new civil rights issue’.


11 posted on 06/07/2007 8:10:09 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Sen. Graham, that's right... Say it loud, i'm an American citizen and i'm proud... heifer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

If we apply the laws as we should, all these illegals will disappear and I believe more opportunity will be available. Do you think the Black Caucus silence is to benefit the blacks? I believe it is to keep them reliant on the government by limiting any opportunity for them to progress. So in essence they are saving the argument for a later date to support any and all programs, but most importantly the vote, to their advantage.


12 posted on 06/07/2007 8:15:29 AM PDT by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
The Congressional Black Caucus is about places at the trough for members of the Congressional Black Caucus. They make a few speeches, they throw a few crumbs on the ground and their constituents are happy, and their constituents don’t understand and don’t care about the immigration issue. They don't think it affects them.

This is good because keeping the CDC's place at the trough means keeping the White leadership of the Democratic Party happy, not protecting the interests of their constituents. The White leadership sees THEIR permanent majority rule brought about by unrestricted immigration.

The CBC will start to get upset when they discover that more Browns in Congress means fewer Blacks in Congress. They won’t understand that until redistricting comes up in 2011 after the next census. Then they will scream. And they will be bought off until 2021, when they will be worse off and will scream louder, but will have less pull. Then they as individuals will be desperately trying to hold on to whatever scrap of power they have, in the hope they reach retirement age before the power vanishes entirely.

13 posted on 06/07/2007 8:36:22 AM PDT by Cheburashka (DUmmieland = Opus Dopium. In all senses of the word dope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

My keyboard is toying with me. Sometimes it is working, today, and sometimes it isn-’t. See?| I have decided it is a gremlin, as the dog, a Yorkie, can-’t jump= up= this high.


14 posted on 06/07/2007 1:35:07 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They've screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Your post #9 is poignantly on target. As a white living in MA, I have been perplexed for years that Senator Kennedy has been working tirelessly since 1965 to flood the country with immigrants, legal and illegal, who are in direct competition for jobs with the poorest American citizens. So many of the citizens who need those jobs, who need that first step up onto the ladder into the middle class, are blacks — the very voters that Kennedy and the Democrats rely so heavily upon. Clearly, the Democrats take the black vote for granted, and pay only lip service to black interests.

And so I have asked black acquaintances why blacks are not objecting loudly to our open borders, to the family reunification emphasis in our immigration policy. The reply is always that they are aware of what is happening, but they don’t know what to do about it - no black or Democrat leader has gone near the problem. I tell them that conservatives who want to switch legal immigration to a skills-based criterion, who want to close the borders and shut down jobs for illegals so that they will self-deport, are their best allies. But it seems that most blacks are unwilling to vote for anyone but a Democrat — even when they understand that the Democrats are often their worst enemies.

On many occasions I have called and emailed Senators Kerry and Kennedy and asked why they promote an immigration policy that is so harmful to poor and black American citizens. Neither has ever paid me the courtesy of a reply.


15 posted on 06/09/2007 1:54:02 AM PDT by Knutsdatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson