To: tpaine
courtesy ping
KC Burke
Thanks KC.
Why Hal is so obsessed with this controversy is a minor mystery.
And why he insists on taunting/mischaracterizing me as a 'longtime supporter' is simply another obsessive act.
My involvement is simple, -- I and my wife saw the 'streak of light' video the night of the crash, - and we were both amazed the next morning that it no longer 'existed'.
I have no specific theory of what happened, but I know what I saw that night.
Apparently, this drives hal into hissy fits.
I'd suggest he get a grip on his emotions.
Well, that settles it for me. Thanks for your frankness.
You've changed your story. Here's what you said before - and the evidence it wasn't so then either:
"My wife & I saw the 'party tape' loop being shown on a network satellite feed the night of the incident. Obviously, if I had the 'cocktail party tape', we would know exactly. It disappeared after being shown a few times many years ago, as has been discussed on many previous threads."
Here's what you were unknowingly talking about then:
http://judiciary.senate.gov/oldsite/51099lsa.htm
(quote) The photo taken by Kabot depicts a bearing of north/northeast. TWA Flight 800 was south/southwest almost directly behind her. Photograph analyzed by CIA National Imagery and Mapping Administration (NIMA) advised that
1. THERE IS OBJECT IN PHOTO
2. OBJECT IS NOT A MISSILE
3. OBJECT APPEARS TO BE AN AIRCRAFT
Not possible to ID aircraft because:
Not possible to determine distance of object from camera.
Exact time of photo unknown. (time frame only is known)
Insufficient detail in photo to determine type of aircraft.
4. OBJECT IS NOT A DRONE
No drone exercises conducted near Long Island July 17, 1996