Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/07/2007 9:19:24 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jdm
Foiled terror plots often will seem ridiculous and unlikely, especially when they are preempted.

Atta and his band of "wanna learn to fly, but not how to land" guys would have looked silly too... But we know better now. If a terror plot - or when a terror plot succeeds - the New York Times will be the first to condemn our guys for not catching it... What a world.

2 posted on 06/07/2007 9:23:34 PM PDT by GOPJ (Import fruit, not illegal pickers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

I forget where I read it, I think in Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, but it was about an Indian who decided to do something about the “Iron Horse”. On his first try, he lassoed it and tried to pull it off the tracks. That didn’t work. On his second try, he tore loose a rail.


3 posted on 06/07/2007 9:27:47 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Richard Reid trying to light his shoe-borne-explosives (SBE) on fire sounded pretty funny at first too. When I realized what would have happened if he hadn’t failed though, it made me sick with dread at how close to death the hundreds on that plane were.


4 posted on 06/07/2007 9:29:17 PM PDT by DrGunsforHands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm
Thank you for posting this! The folks who run the NY Times and the 'the terror threat is exaggerated' crowd should read this! I'm not holding my breath that they will

Mr. Lowry hits a home run with this one.

5 posted on 06/07/2007 9:30:02 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (You are my tagline, my only tagline, you make me happy when skies are gray...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

They only have to “get lucky” once.


6 posted on 06/07/2007 9:35:23 PM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

“.....pleading that the amateurishness of the plot limited its newsworthiness.”

It is a mistake to regard this as “amateurish”. Forget the “pipeline” part of it. Rupturing and igniting just one of these tanks would have begun a chain reaction (albeit a slow one) until most of the tanks on the farm were ruptured from the heat. There are simply too many tanks too close together in this age of terror. Rupture, ignite and spill just one of them and it would be like a roomful of pingpong balls on mousetraps. You do not and cannot extinguish 500k or a million gallons of anything spread on the ground before the next one bursts and ignites, etc etc.


12 posted on 06/07/2007 9:50:14 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lepton

Bookmark bump


15 posted on 06/08/2007 6:57:00 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm
This is why even foiled plots deserve to be taken seriously.

A terror plot can be something as simple as flying here, renting a car, and then plowing througho a crowd of people on a pedestrian mall in a city.

That's what the liberal idiots choose not to grasp. The terroristic intent, once revealed, needs to be shut down with extreme prejudice.

16 posted on 06/08/2007 6:59:30 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson