[CottShop]

oh wait, and don’t forget the 60 million year old eyewitnesses that can verify all the hypothesis of evolution. You know, those faolks that witnessed wolves taking to the sea, lizards leaping into the air and hten later developing wings because of the ‘need’ to feed in an environment other than the ground etc etc. Yup- Plenty of investigating reporters were on the scene back then witnessing actual events as they unfolded.

You see folks- Evo scientists are allowed to look at old bones, make up some elaborate story, and call it science- However, ID’ers aren’t allowed to point out factual design in nature- point to the many instances of it, point out that it is irreducibly complex, without being accused of infering *gasp* that there might just perhaps be a disigner behind the design. Harumph... Why that thar is religion! Psuedo-science-Apologetics!

[presently no screen name]

that there might just perhaps be a designer behind the design

Exactly. Autos, clothes, buildings, bridges, roadways, airplanes, tunnels, etc. all have designers/architects. But the most incredible creation comes into existence with a 'puff'. One is blinded/deceived to believe that - I can't imagine anyone being that lame on purpose.

[ahayes]

that there might just perhaps be a disigner behind the design

Is this like turtles all the way down? There's a designer for the designer for the designer for the designer. . . If everything "designed" needs a designer, who designed God?

You know, those faolks that witnessed wolves taking to the sea,

This is not proposed by evolutionists.

lizards leaping into the air and hten later developing wings because of the ‘need’ to feed in an environment other than the ground etc etc.

Again, not proposed by evolutionists. Evolution does not come about because of need. It is the result of multiple small changes occurring by chance and being selected for because they are useful, although they might not have the same use millions of years down the road.