Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Inevitable Consequences Of Illegal Immigration [Elitists Suck Alert]
Family Security Matters ^ | June 11, 2007 | Ivy Scarborough

Posted on 06/11/2007 10:29:40 AM PDT by conservativecorner

The negligence – even recklessness – in the discharge of their duties to the nation by the President and Congress in permitting illegal immigration to continue, and their support of legislation which would encourage illegal immigrants to stay in this country or prompt others to enter in defiance of our laws are disgraceful. Such strong language is warranted and more.

I am in a better position than most to judge the impact of illegal immigration. My background is in international studies and international law, which I taught for years at a local university. I have provided briefings for the military on the subjects of terrorism and Afghanistan. More importantly, I have spent a great deal of time in Muslim countries (6 so far) and was with the mujahadeen in Afghanistan in 1985 during the war with the Soviet Union. I gained insight from those experiences into what we might expect from radical Islam. As a result, in a commentary published in a Nashville newspaper in 1996, I predicted a catastrophic attack on the United States in the foreseeable future and added that the "earlier World Trade Center bombing would be a pinprick rehearsal for what would follow".

More immediately, my law practice is focused on representing victims of crime, particularly victims of drunk driving, in civil lawsuits. In the last 5 years I have represented 6 families who have lost a total of 7 loved ones (not including one survivor who was severely disabled) to illegal immigrants who were driving drunk. In each of those cases the immigrant had no legal documents and no driver's license. In sum each illegal immigrant had dishonored the laws of the nation - not simply in their entry but in multiple ways thereafter. Innocent Americans paid the price in blood for our government's massive failure to protect them. Though I am reluctant to put this in economic terms – it goes much deeper and far more is at stake – I will do so because it seems that this is all that many people in our nation's leadership will heed. In three present cases my clients' loved ones were killed and injured by drunk illegal immigrants. In each case the medical costs were huge (totaling now over $750,000 collectively). This had to be paid by insurance companies. A father - who was about to be shipped out to Iraq with the military – is now permanently brain damaged and will never work again. In all of these cases I have handled, with one exception, the drunk driver was uninsured. In each the American criminal justice system must deal with the legal issues, and the illegal immigrants end up in American jails and prisons. This only refers to direct financial costs not indirect financial, social and legal consequences.

There can be only two reasons why our government has permitted this: First, a sizable number of businesses have significant financial vested interests in exploiting the labor of these immigrants. Second, their influence (money dominates American politics) coupled with many politicians' timidity about offending what has become a significant voting block.

All arguments and rationalizations founded on altruism are disingenuous and hypocritical. There are many ways in which we could altruistically aid these immigrants – I have advocated for many of them since the mid 80s, without result – but they can and should be implemented only through adherence to the laws of the nation - all the laws.

Only the selfish beneficiaries (corporate and individual) of cheap labor benefit by illegal immigration. The rest of America is subsidizing – in blood, suffering and money - their greed. Thus, there is folly and tragedy in triplicate:

1) The American people are victimized through crime and their pocketbooks. 2) The laws of the nation are dishonored – not just by immigrants but by our own people – thus undermining the integrity of our legal and social order; and 3) Immigrants are exploited for their cheap labor – all done surreptitiously.

Anyone but a fool understands that if a nation permits either citizens or aliens to dishonor the nation's laws this inevitably leads to loss of respect for the law generally -a principle demonstrated by sociologists and criminologists in studies of criminal behavior.

If the present trend continues we can expect these results: First, there will be continued and growing crime at the hands of immigrants (now illegal but who seek the imprimatur of legality) who were not christened with the notion when they crossed our borders that they must obey all of our laws, not just some.

Second, the demographic makeup of the nation will shift even more dramatically - it already has – and, with it, our nation’s social fabric, mores and values will change fundamentally. Previous generations of legal immigrants - and that distinction of going about the entry legally is very important - came because they were attracted to what American stood for, what it believed, its values, not just its wealth and economic opportunity. Thus they embraced America rather than sought to make it over into something of their choosing. The conduct and words of the present massive influx of illegal immigrants clearly tell us that is not their motivation or intent.

Third, the President and Congress have permitted what any security analyst or competent military officer knows to be a flagrant breach of our national security in uncontrolled borders and unenforced laws of entry. This will lead to others paying with their lives if it is not reversed. Finally, those politicians who lend their names and energies to any legislation not intended to completely reverse all of these trends and practices will, in the retrospective of history, face the stigma of having failed the American people.

# #


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: immigration; respectforlaw; ruleoflaw

1 posted on 06/11/2007 10:29:43 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

12 million “new” citizens against the IRS for the last seven years of Earned Income Credit.


2 posted on 06/11/2007 10:33:43 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Let’s move the capital to southwest texas or west LA. Our elite lawgivers can live alongside their favorite undocumented workers.


3 posted on 06/11/2007 10:34:05 AM PDT by x_plus_one (As long as we pretend to not be fighting Iran in Iraq, we can't pretend to win the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

sorry

...”filing against the IRS...


4 posted on 06/11/2007 10:34:12 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
bottom line.....
Those senators or house reps that vote for this legislation are traitors. These people voting for this legislation hate this nation and the people of this nation. The voters for this legislation have sold this nation to people not citizens of the nation, and expect the citizens of the nation to be quiet and 'roll over one more time'.
5 posted on 06/11/2007 10:35:49 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

The US government has a policy of “cheap” food. Government subsidies provide income to producers which helps keep down price increases. Cheap imported labor provides extra profit which holds down price increases. If food prices were to behave as energy prices, there would be violent confrontations against government.


6 posted on 06/11/2007 10:38:18 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
will, in the retrospective of history, face the stigma of having failed the American people.

This presumes that they would care ...

7 posted on 06/11/2007 10:42:26 AM PDT by clamper1797 (Fred Thompson Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

This is not over yet. Bush refuses to give up this easily. It's his stuborn character. He will try to resurect it and call it something else. We have to keep our guard up. We need to keep the pressure up.

STAGE TWO is to go after the people who hire illegals. Start giving them fines and arresting them. Just catch ten or 100 of them on the nightly news. The magnet will dry up and most of the 12 million will go home by themselves.

As an adendum, we should anonymously call the IRS, people working "off the books" means taxes ain't being paid. Make anonymous fliers and hang them around the neighborhood, name names. It's time to embarras these bustards, whether they give to the GOP or Rats, we don't need them.

STOP AMNESTY NOW!! WE CAN DO IT!!

CALL! CALL! CALL! CALL! AND KEEP CALLING TILL THE LINES FRY!

WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! TILL YOU RUN OUT OF INK IN YOUR PEN!

Bombard the Democrats as well, especially the ones that ran on an anti illegal immigration plank and the ones in marginal districts who could be vulnerable. keep pounding on them. This is a bipartisan issue not a Conservative or Liberal issue BUT AN AMERICAN issue.

8 posted on 06/11/2007 10:45:42 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
This is not the jobs Americans won’t do BS is it? It’s not jobs Americans won’t do, but it’s jobs Americans won’t do for cash wages an illegal alien gets from their criminal employers. The law of supply and demand concerning wages doesn't’t work when you add 12 to 20 million illegals into a pool that should be much smaller. It’s basic Econ 101.
9 posted on 06/11/2007 10:48:02 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: From One - Many

Can we impeach the Senate and the President both for pushing this terrible amnesty bill. The President at least has a sworn duty to enforce the laws of our country, and it is obvious he is not.


10 posted on 06/11/2007 11:00:50 AM PDT by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

HECK! If we make food more costly, maybe we’ll eat less and work toward solving the obesity problem in our folks.


11 posted on 06/11/2007 11:08:10 AM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” -Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Perhaps the new ethanol mandates — linking corn (food) and ethanol (fuel) — were not so smart a move on the part of our Congress-critters, then?


12 posted on 06/11/2007 11:10:20 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * WAHOO WA! * Allen for Senator from VA * Fred Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

Why can’t we petition the Supreme Court for redress in citing the President for not enforcing the law of the land? With all of the lawyers on this site, there has to be an angle where we can have the judicial branch of government exercise its oversight of the Executive branch of Government.

I mean, we can petition the court when a law as applied is thought to be unjust and unconstitutional. When that is found to be the case, then the Supreme Court overturns the law. Why won’t it work for when the law is considered part of the legal code of the USA and not enforced? Why can’t we seek redress for laws passed by the Legislative branch of Government, Signed by the Executive Branch; but not enforced? Wasn’t there also funding passed for enforcement of these laws?

Maybe we can set a long lasting precedent where laws that are passed by the representatives, signed by the Executive and funded by the representatives MUST be enforced in the most strenuous manner. What a hoot that would be!


13 posted on 06/11/2007 11:20:26 AM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” -Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Just say NO to Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!

U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121

U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121

White House comments: (202) 456-1111

Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep

Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm


14 posted on 06/11/2007 11:31:16 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

see writ of mandamus, writ of mandate


15 posted on 06/11/2007 1:01:18 PM PDT by rolling_stone (sOME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson