Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus

Please don’t take my words out picking anc choosing which ones to make some inane point.

I clearly said GORE and Kerry... noting that some states favored Gore..

I also noted OHIO as the key state in contention.

That is the point. The GOP MUST CARRY OHIO... and I do not think that we can if we nominate a wishy washy Republican.

Now, if you care, address THAT point.

= )


38 posted on 06/12/2007 11:58:19 AM PDT by RachelFaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: RachelFaith

>> I also noted OHIO as the key state in contention. <<

You said “She does not need to worry about winning even a majority of votes if she holds and has +1 state.” My point was that “holding” was no light task. If she wins Ohio, but looses even tiny New Hampshire, she loses. You sound like you’re ready to surrender defeat! Talk about “inane points!”

Incidentally, “the states Kerry and Gore won” means “every state carried by both Kerry and Gore,” not “every state carried by Kerry OR Gore.”


39 posted on 06/12/2007 12:10:40 PM PDT by dangus (Mr. President, "Choke on it b!+ch" is not a very good campaign slogan for your amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson