Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Chief Mueller Often Uses FBI Jet Bought for Counterterrorism
The Washington Post ^ | June 12, 2007 | John Solomon

Posted on 06/12/2007 9:20:33 AM PDT by OldCorps

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: SubGeniusX

Thanks for your reply, Hillary.


21 posted on 06/12/2007 11:04:43 AM PDT by billhilly (My former tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck
Muellers' a senior executive with international scope and thus the need is justified. Note, further in the story, he logs 180Hrs/year

Gulfstream V operating cost: math from the article, $4,000 per hour, his share, $720,000.

Cessna Citation operating cost: about $1,500 per hour, cost to fly 180 hours, $270,000.

Annual savings to the taxpayer should he fly the Cessna like he's supposed to: $450,000.

22 posted on 06/12/2007 11:12:04 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Annual savings to the taxpayer should he fly the Cessna like he's supposed to: $450,000.

Add to that.... Who is flying in the Cessna now? Which mid-level flunkie graduated from flying commericial to flying in the Cessna because it wasn't busy flying the Mueller? :)
23 posted on 06/12/2007 11:21:52 AM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
Thanks for your reply, Hillary.

WTF?

I was responding to your (inane) comparassion of this this plane to Air Force 1...

AF1 sole purpose is to transport the President...

If this plane had been obtained with the purpose of ferrying the Director around then it would not be an issue.

The "stated" purpose of this plane was for CT purposes, not transporting the FBI director to speaking engagements ... if thats not co-opting it's intended use what is?

24 posted on 06/12/2007 11:24:41 AM PDT by SubGeniusX ($29.95 Guarantees Your Salvation!!! Or TRIPLE Your Money Back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
In that scenario, it is liekly that there may well be a few hours spent before approval for a FBI team was granted and it is unlikely that there would be any significant time lost. If there was, then this issue certainly could be revisited.

I would think that, "revisiting" that type of situation would be a defininte case of "too little, too late".

Why even risk it?

25 posted on 06/12/2007 11:30:07 AM PDT by SubGeniusX ($29.95 Guarantees Your Salvation!!! Or TRIPLE Your Money Back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Daus
Add to that.... Who is flying in the Cessna now?

Good point, I didn't think that far down. So it's not just $1,500 vs. $5,000.

Let's take four hours of flight in the "public servant" world. Flunky takes commercial: $300. Mueller takes Cessna: $6,000. Gulfstream sits idle. Total: $6,300.

Now for the "executive privilege" world: Flunky takes Cessna instead of commercial: -$300 + $6,000 = $5,700. Mueller takes Gulfstream: $16,000. Total: $21,700.

Four hours blew $15,400, so 180 hours is: $693,000.

26 posted on 06/12/2007 11:35:14 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
Isn’t it true with these expensive jets that they are really only cost-effective if they are used as much as possible?

They are only more cost-effective if they are full. If Mueller is flying by himself or with only a few staff, it's a horrendous waste. If he has 15 people who would have flown commerical, than you might have some savings.
27 posted on 06/12/2007 11:43:01 AM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SubGeniusX
My guess is, that when they talk to the operations group regarding the scheduling, they take the rsiks and the conditions into account. They then get approval from their superiors.

I have no problem with that course of action as long as they listen to the operations group and as long as the operations group takes into account the concievable risks and allows for them, without feeling that somehow they have to accomodate the Director.

There has been no allegation that any thing of that sort is going on.

28 posted on 06/12/2007 11:59:10 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson