Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldCorps
No lies have been told. The vast majority of the use of the jet is for the purposes it was requested for. There is no allegation that the Director is using the jet in lieu of agents needing it for a mission.

If the Director continues to makes sure there is no conflict in his scheduling, and he continues to get approval from his superiors for the trips, I see no problem whatsoever.

He is the chief official for the FBI, and the comm and security available on that aircraft would be helpful to him in the event of an emergency.

The only time I would have a problem is if in his use of the jet, it was not available for a mission requiring it. But that allegation has not been made.

4 posted on 06/12/2007 9:27:07 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head

Isn’t it true with these expensive jets that they are really only cost-effective if they are used as much as possible?


6 posted on 06/12/2007 9:29:51 AM PDT by RightFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson