The guy never quits. He is already facing a backlash, and it will get much worse, if he keeps up.
To: TigerLikesRooster
This had better end with this lunatic losing his job and being forced to pay restitution to the drycleaners.
What a royal assclown.
2 posted on
06/13/2007 7:25:44 PM PDT by
wideawake
("Pearl Harbor is all America's fault, right, Mommy?" - Ron Paul, age 6, 12/7/1941)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Surely, this idiot can’t possible expect to be taken seriously again.
3 posted on
06/13/2007 7:26:05 PM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: TigerLikesRooster
He will keep it up. He is nuts. No rational person would do
this. He should be removed from his Judicial position and the
legal profession.
To: TigerLikesRooster
He cried when talking about his lost pants?!
5 posted on
06/13/2007 7:26:22 PM PDT by
rockprof
To: TigerLikesRooster
“Don’t cry for me, lost pantalones” was what he sang?
To: TigerLikesRooster
Somebody needs to take this guy outside and just beat his ass.
7 posted on
06/13/2007 7:27:59 PM PDT by
umgud
("When seconds count, the police are just 10 minutes away!")
To: TigerLikesRooster
Pearson is no longer seeking damages related to the lost pants and is now focusing his claims on two signs in the shop that have since been removed. He alleges that Jin Chung, Soo Chung and Ki Chung, the South Korean immigrant owners of the mom-and-pop business, committed fraud and misled consumers with signs that claimed "Satisfaction Guaranteed" and "Same Day Service." In his opening statement at the civil trial Tuesday, Pearson said he wanted to examine the culture that allowed "a group of defendants to engage in bad business practices for five years." My knee-jerk reaction is that this "judge" is a anti-Korean racist pig. However, upon further reflection, I think if his pants are that precious to him, may I suggest an alternative to traditional dry cleaning?
8 posted on
06/13/2007 7:28:34 PM PDT by
Tamar1973
(Riding the Korean Wave, one BYJ movie at a time! (http://www.byj.co.kr))
To: TigerLikesRooster
A black shakedown artist (ala Jackson) going after Koran business folk. If I saw him on the street tonight, I would kick his ass to the other side, and spit on his face.
11 posted on
06/13/2007 7:32:32 PM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Elections have consequences.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
A pair of pants from a blue and maroon suit Ok That's gotta be a crime in itself
17 posted on
06/13/2007 7:41:40 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(Laws are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
To: TigerLikesRooster
“dministrative law judge Roy L. Pearson first sued Custom Cleaners over a pair of pants”
This guy is rendering legal judgements. Incredible. Every verdict he has decided should be up for appeal. This insanity shows he is an utter fool. He should be committed.
And how much tax money is going for this “trial”?
And some say we can’t cut government spending....
19 posted on
06/13/2007 7:42:46 PM PDT by
HereInTheHeartland
(Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
To: TigerLikesRooster
were I on the bench hearing this, it would never have gone this far. Cleaner pays man $100. Man pays court costs for being so stupid.
End of case.
23 posted on
06/13/2007 8:06:15 PM PDT by
llevrok
(“No more nice guys in the WH! I want a real SOB in there!” - R. Limbaugh)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Two Wongs will make it white....
To: TigerLikesRooster
It might be a good time for the court to order a psychiatric evaluation of this hysterical pantload.
25 posted on
06/13/2007 8:32:26 PM PDT by
Post Toasties
(It's not a smear if it's true.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
A pair of pants from a blue and maroon suit was missing when he requested it two days later. He said Soo Chung tried to give him a pair of charcoal gray pants.As well as having lost touch with reality, Pearson is apparently immune to any hints suggesting he improve his taste in clothing.
27 posted on
06/13/2007 8:44:17 PM PDT by
Post Toasties
(It's not a smear if it's true.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Would this be called a pants-suit?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson